Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Matthew J Page1, Joanne E McKenzie1, Patrick M Bossuyt2
1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
The updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement offers new guidance for transparently reporting systematic reviews. It reflects advances in methodology for identifying, selecting, appraising, and synthesizing studies.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research Methodology
- Evidence Synthesis
- Scientific Reporting Standards
Background:
- The original Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was published in 2009.
- Advances in systematic review methodology and terminology over the past decade necessitate an updated guideline.
- The PRISMA 2020 statement supersedes the 2009 version.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the updated PRISMA 2020 reporting guideline.
- To provide enhanced guidance for transparently reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
- To incorporate recent methodological advancements in the field.
Main Methods:
- The PRISMA 2020 statement includes a 27-item checklist.
- An expanded checklist details reporting recommendations for each item.
- Revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews are presented.
- A specific checklist for PRISMA 2020 abstracts is included.
Main Results:
- The PRISMA 2020 statement offers new reporting guidance.
- Guidance reflects advances in methods for identifying, selecting, appraising, and synthesizing studies.
- The structure and presentation of items are modified for easier implementation.
Conclusions:
- The PRISMA 2020 statement is the current standard for reporting systematic reviews.
- It ensures transparency and reflects contemporary best practices in evidence synthesis.
- Researchers are encouraged to adopt the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for their systematic reviews.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Ethics in Research

