Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

03:53
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
1.5K
COVID-19 and the problem of clinical knowledge
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA. js1115@columbia.edu.
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
|April 1, 2021
Summary
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted gaps in understanding how clinicians gain medical knowledge. This paper explores the epistemological trade-offs involved in clinical knowledge acquisition, crucial for both pandemics and everyday practice.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Medicine
- Medical Epistemology
- Clinical Knowledge Acquisition
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant challenges in clinical and philosophical aspects of medicine.
- Existing understanding focuses on physician-scientists' knowledge interrogation, neglecting clinicians' methods.
- A gap exists in analyzing the epistemological costs and benefits of how clinicians acquire new knowledge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the lacuna in understanding clinicians' knowledge acquisition methods.
- To analyze the epistemological costs and benefits of various clinical knowledge acquisition pathways.
- To underscore the importance of this topic during pandemics and non-pandemic times.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of medical epistemology.
- Examination of knowledge acquisition strategies employed by clinicians.
- Philosophical inquiry into the nature of clinical knowledge.
Main Results:
- Identified a critical gap in understanding the epistemological dimensions of clinical knowledge acquisition.
- Outlined the trade-offs associated with different methods clinicians use to gain new knowledge.
- Established the relevance of this understanding for medical practice and preparedness.
Conclusions:
- COVID-19 underscored the need to better understand how clinicians learn and update their knowledge.
- Analyzing the epistemology of clinical knowledge acquisition is vital for medical advancement and public health.
- This understanding is essential for navigating both crises and routine medical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
9.9K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.9K
Causality in Epidemiology
1.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.2K
Principles of Disease Surveillance
295
Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
295
Clinical Trials: Overview
4.1K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.1K
Critical Thinking II
3.7K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.7K
Patient-centered Care
2.6K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.6K

