Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

2.3K
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
2.3K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

770
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
770
Non-Verbal Cues01:29

Non-Verbal Cues

119
Non-verbal communication extends beyond gestures and facial expressions to include vocal elements known as paralanguage. Paralanguage consists of non-verbal vocal cues such as pitch, loudness, speech rate, pauses, and non-verbal vocalizations like laughter, sighs, and moans. These elements not only accompany speech but also provide critical emotional and contextual information.The Role of Paralanguage in CommunicationParalanguage adds depth to spoken language by conveying emotions and...
119
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

539
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
539
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

558
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
558
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

5.0K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
5.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion in generative AI applications for healthcare education: a scoping review.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same author

Correction: Patient-Provider Communication and Health Disparities: An Experiment Exploring Language Proficiency and Communication Accommodation.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2026
Same author

Enhancing Next-Generation Sequencing Sensitivity with High-Recovery Adapter Ligation and Cas9-Mediated Dimer Elimination.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer with Microsatellite Instability-High or DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiencies: A Multicenter Pooled Analysis (KCSG-CO24-03).

Cancer research and treatment·2026
Same author

Metformin Promotes Acquisition of Immune Tolerance in Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy.

Allergy, asthma & immunology research·2026
Same author

Preliminary normative study of Cognosis: A digital cognitive assessment battery for Korean elders.

Digital health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.1K

Tracking nonliteral language processing using audiovisual scenarios.

Kathrin Rothermich1, Elizabeth Schoen Simmons2, Pavitra Rao Makarla3

  • 1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
|April 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding sarcasm and jocularity in conversations requires processing multiple cues. This study used eye tracking to show that people look at faces more during nonliteral interactions and find jocular statements harder to detect than sarcastic ones.

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.4K
Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

18.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.1K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.4K
Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

18.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Communication Studies

Background:

  • Processing nonliteral language (sarcasm, jocularity) relies on integrating verbal, paralinguistic, and nonverbal cues.
  • Previous research predominantly used static or written stimuli, limiting understanding of dynamic, real-time communication.
  • Ecologically valid stimuli are crucial for studying naturalistic social interaction and intention recognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the processing of dynamic literal and nonliteral intentions in face-to-face communication.
  • To examine how individuals use visual cues, particularly facial information, during the interpretation of spoken intentions.
  • To compare the processing of sarcastic and jocular statements within dynamic social interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized eye tracking technology to monitor participants' visual attention during video vignette viewing.
  • Employed short, ecologically valid video vignettes depicting literal and nonliteral social interactions.
  • Participants (N=37) identified speakers' intentions, with a focus on distinguishing between literal, sarcastic, and jocular statements.

Main Results:

  • Participants exhibited greater difficulty identifying jocular statements as insincere compared to sarcastic statements.
  • Significantly more time was spent looking at faces during nonliteral (sarcastic, jocular) interactions versus literal ones.
  • Attention shifting between talkers was slower for literal positive intentions than for jocular or literal negative intentions.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the Standard Pragmatic Model and Parallel-Constraint-Satisfaction Model of nonliteral language processing.
  • Dynamic, multimodal cues, especially facial information, are critical for interpreting nonliteral meanings in real-time communication.
  • Jocularity presents unique processing challenges compared to sarcasm, suggesting distinct cognitive mechanisms.