MutSα mismatch repair protein stability is governed by subunit interaction, acetylation, and ubiquitination

Tim Arlow1, Junwon Kim2, Joanna E Haye-Bertolozzi3

  • 1Ophthalmic Associates, Johnstown, PA.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)
|April 1, 2021
PubMed

Insights

DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 stability is regulated by its partner Msh6, acetylation by Gcn5, and ubiquitination by Not4. This ensures proper function of the MutSα complex.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Protein Regulation

Background:

  • Eukaryotic DNA mismatch recognition relies on MutSα (Msh2/Msh6) and MutSβ (Msh2/Msh3) complexes.
  • Previous studies in yeast showed MSH6 deletion reduces wild-type Msh2 levels by approximately 50%.
  • The interplay between Msh2, Msh6, and Msh3 in complex stability and regulation requires further elucidation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reciprocal regulation between Msh2 and Msh6 steady-state levels.
  • To determine the role of subunit interaction, acetylation, and ubiquitination in Msh2 stability.
  • To understand the impact of Msh6 absence on Msh2 turnover and degradation pathways.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Msh2 and Msh6 protein levels in wild-type and mutant yeast strains (e.g., ΔMSH6, ΔGcn5, ΔNot4).
  • Characterization of Msh2 missense variants with altered dimerization capabilities.
  • Investigation of Msh2 degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
  • Mutagenesis of conserved lysine residues in Msh2 to assess their role in stability.
  • Assessing the impact of Gcn5 (acetylation) and Not4 (ubiquitination) on Msh2 levels.

Main Results:

  • Msh6 and Msh2 exhibit reciprocal regulation of steady-state levels, unlike Msh3 and Msh2.
  • Msh2 variants that dimerize with Msh6 are destabilized upon Msh6 deletion, indicating a dimer stabilization mechanism.
  • In the absence of Msh6, Msh2 undergoes faster turnover mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
  • Mutagenesis of specific Msh2 lysines near the dimer interface partially restored Msh2 levels without Msh6.
  • Gcn5-mediated acetylation and Not4-mediated ubiquitination are key regulators of Msh2 stability.
  • Absence of Gcn5 decreased Msh2 levels, while deletion of Not4 stabilized Msh2.
  • The stabilizing effects of Msh6 or absence of Not4 on Msh2 are dependent on Gcn5 activity.

Conclusions:

  • Wild-type MutSα protein stability is governed by a complex interplay of subunit interaction, acetylation, and ubiquitination.
  • Msh6 binding stabilizes Msh2, protecting it from ubiquitin-proteasome mediated degradation.
  • Gcn5 and Not4 act as critical regulators of Msh2 stability through acetylation and ubiquitination, respectively, influencing MutSα function.

Related Concept Videos

Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
42.5K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.7K
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....
8.1K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
34.5K