Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Anatomic classification of mitral annular calcification for surgical and transcatheter mitral valve replacement
Sophia L Alexis1, Talal S Alzahrani2, Deniz Akkoc3
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Insights
A new multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) method quantifies mitral annular calcification (MAC) to guide treatment. This approach offers an objective algorithm for managing MAC patients, improving treatment selection and outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Quantifying mitral annular calcification (MAC) in all patients using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is crucial for guiding treatment decisions.
- A systematic and objective approach to MAC quantification is currently lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a systematic approach for quantifying MAC using MDCT in all-comers.
- To establish an objective treatment algorithm for MAC based on anatomical classification and operability.
Main Methods:
- 82 patients with MAC underwent MDCT for evaluation of surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), or medical management.
- MAC was classified as Type 1 (<270° annular calcium) or Type 2 (≥270°).
- Type 2 MAC was further sub-classified into 2A/2B based on the presence or absence of predicted left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction with virtual valve placement.
Main Results:
- Type 1 MAC was observed in 51.2% of patients, Type 2A in 18.3%, and Type 2B in 30.5%.
- Hybrid transatrial TMVR or SMVR was performed in 50.0% of operable Type 1 patients and 40.0% of Type 2B surgical candidates.
- All percutaneous TMVR patients (primarily Type 2A) expired, while the hybrid TMVR group (Type 1/2B) showed comparable mortality to medical management and lower predicted operative risk.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous TMVR in Type 2A MAC patients, despite high-risk profiles, was associated with the highest mortality.
- The developed MAC classification and treatment algorithm provide an objective framework for managing diverse MAC presentations.
- Hybrid transatrial TMVR demonstrated a potentially safer approach for specific MAC subtypes (Type 1/2B) compared to percutaneous options in high-risk individuals.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: A systematic approach to quantify mitral annular calcification (MAC) in all-comers by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is essential to guide treatment, but lacking.
Methods:
From September 2015 to July 2019, 82 patients with MAC underwent MDCT at two institutions to evaluate for surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), or medical management. Type 1 MAC was defined as <270° annular calcium and Type 2 as ≥270°. Absence/presence of predicted left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction with virtual valve placement was used to further define Type 2 MAC into 2A/B for our treatment algorithm.
Results:
Type 1 MAC was present in 51.2%, Type 2A in 18.3%, and Type 2B in 30.5%. Operable Type 1 patients (50.0%) underwent hybrid transatrial TMVR or SMVR. Type 2A underwent a variety of treatments, and Type 2B surgical candidates (40.0%) underwent hybrid transatrial TMVR secondary to difficult suture anchoring with significant MAC and predicted LVOT obstruction. At a follow-up of 29.6 ± 12.0 months, mortality was 42.7% with 46.3% in the intervention group and 39.0% in the medical group (p = 0.47). All percutaneous TMVR patients expired. This translated to a disproportionate number of Type 2A deaths (80.0% with intervention), but all were high/extreme surgical risk. The hybrid TMVR group consisted of 95.0% Type 1/2B patients and had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of operative mortality (7.4% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.43)/mortality.
Conclusions:
The highest mortality was seen in percutaneous TMVR Type 2A MAC patients, but they were at the greatest risk. Here we provide an objective MAC treatment algorithm for all-comers based on operability/anatomy.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

