Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa
Published on: August 30, 2018
Optimising sampling strategies for emergency response: Vegetation sampling
Yu Khomutinin1, S Fesenko2, S Levchuk1
1Ukrainian Institute of Agricultural Radiology, National University of Life and Environment Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Abstract:
The lessons learned from the plant sampling campaigns implemented in the most Chernobyl affected countries are described. The variability of 137Cs activity concentrations in plants taken from a variety of sampling sites, as well as the uncertainties around the aggregated transfer factors (Tag) from soil to plants were estimated. The sampling sites covered both agricultural and natural lands in different landscapes: floodplain, plains, and watershed meadows. To determine parameters of the lognormal distribution of the 137Cs activity concentration in plants and the values of corresponding aggregated transfer factor (Tag) values, from 25 to 49 plant and soil samples were collected at each sampling site with the grid increment that varied from 1 to 10 m. The gradients of deposition i.e. monotonic changes (trends) of the contamination density conditioned by the global (in respect to study area) gradient of fallout were not observed in any of the study sites. Therefore, the variability of radionuclide contamination density (and activity concentrations in the soil) within the study sites were determined by only random factors such as microheterogeneity of radioactive deposition in a sampling point. The mean standard deviation of the logarithms of 137Cs activity concentrations in plants sampled in all such sites and the corresponding transfer factors were similar for all sites studied and were not dependent on the mean soil contamination density at the site, the type of radioactive fallout and the vegetation type. The values of the average standard deviation of the 137Cs activity concentration logarithms in plants and the corresponding transfer factors for the vegetation sampling area ≥1 m2 and the relative activity measurement uncertainties ≤10% were estimated as 0.4 ± 0.1 and 0.5 ± 0.1, respectively. A new simple method for optimization of the number of linked (conjugated) plant and soil samples as well as estimates of the activity concentration and transfer factor uncertainties when measuring composite samples were proposed. Based on the results of these studies, the recommendations were made to the sampling of plants for radionuclides.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...

