The Operative Time for Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children Performed with Percutaneous Internal Ring

Przemyslaw Karol Wolak1,2, Agnieszka Strzelecka1, Aneta Piotrowska1

  • 1Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, ul. Żeromskiego 5, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.

Insights

The Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) method is faster for pediatric inguinal hernia repair than the open approach (OA). This finding suggests PIRS may be a preferred surgical option, particularly for female patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Surgical Techniques
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Inguinal hernias are common in children.
  • Surgical repair is the standard treatment.
  • Comparing different surgical approaches is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the operative time of unilateral inguinal hernia repair in children using the open approach (OA) versus the Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) method.
  • To identify factors influencing operative time, such as hernia laterality and patient gender.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients (0-18 years) undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair.
  • Data collected from January 2011 to December 2018.
  • Exclusion of patients with bilateral hernias or other complications.

Main Results:

  • The Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) method resulted in significantly shorter operative times compared to the open approach (OA).
  • Left-sided hernias were associated with longer operative times (p=0.024).
  • Operative time was generally longer in males, and PIRS was faster for both genders, especially females.

Conclusions:

  • The PIRS procedure is more time-efficient than the OA for pediatric inguinal hernia repair.
  • PIRS may be considered a preferred method, particularly for female patients.
  • Further research could explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of PIRS.

Related Concept Videos