Related Experiment Videos

[Ambulatory therapy with amphotericin B]

C Berger1, A Gratwohl, A Tichelli

  • 1Departement Innere Medizin, Kantonsspital Basel.

Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift
|April 23, 1988
PubMed

Insights

Outpatient treatment with amphotericin B (AmB) for systemic fungal infections is feasible and cost-effective. This approach minimizes drug toxicity risks and hospital stays, offering an acceptable alternative to inpatient care.

Area of Science:

  • Mycology
  • Pharmacology
  • Infectious Diseases

Context:

  • Systemic fungal infections require prolonged amphotericin B (AmB) therapy, typically inpatient due to toxicity concerns.
  • Traditional AmB treatment necessitates lengthy hospitalizations, increasing healthcare costs and patient burden.
  • Managing AmB toxicity, particularly renal impairment, is crucial for treatment continuation.

Purpose:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and safety of outpatient amphotericin B (AmB) therapy for systemic fungal infections.
  • To assess the side effect profile and renal function impact during ambulatory AmB treatment.
  • To determine the potential for cost reduction and patient benefit through outpatient AmB administration.

Summary:

  • A study treated 14 outpatients with 164 amphotericin B (AmB) infusions between 1983 and 1987.
  • Side effects were generally mild and manageable, with only one patient experiencing dose reduction due to renal impairment.
  • Outpatient AmB therapy proved feasible in an experienced unit, demonstrating potential for significant cost savings.

Impact:

  • Outpatient amphotericin B (AmB) therapy is a viable and cost-effective alternative to inpatient treatment.
  • This approach can reduce treatment costs and shorten hospital stays, benefiting patients, especially those with malignant diseases.
  • Successful ambulatory AmB administration highlights the potential for decentralized, patient-centered care in managing systemic fungal infections.

Related Concept Videos