Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Based on Stage I Lung Cancer Histology
Johannes Uhlig1, Sumarth Mehta2, Meaghan Dendy Case2
1Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
Purpose:
To assess whether the effectiveness of thermal ablation (TA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as initial treatments for stage I lung cancer varies depending on the histological subtype.
Materials And Methods:
The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I lung cancer treated with TA or SBRT. Patients <18 years, those treated with surgery or chemotherapy, or those with unknown survival and follow-up were excluded. TA and SBRT patients were 1:5 propensity score matched separately for each histological subtype to adjust for confounders. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox models.
Results:
A total of 28,425 patients were included (SBRT, n = 27,478; TA, n = 947). TA was more likely to be used in Caucasian patients, those with more comorbidities and smaller neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the lower lobe, and those whose treatment had taken place in the northeastern United States. After propensity score matching, a cohort with 4,085 SBRT and 817 TA patients with balanced confounders was obtained. In this cohort, OS for TA and SBRT was comparable (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% confidence interval,0.98-1.18; P = .13), although it varied by histological subtypes: higher OS for TA was observed in patients with non-small cell NETs (vs SBRT hazard ratio = 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.95; P = .04). No significant OS differences between TA and SBRT were noted for adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, small cell carcinomas, and non-neuroendocrine large cell carcinomas (each, P > .1).
Conclusions:
OS following TA and SBRT for stage I lung cancer is comparable for most histological subtypes, except that OS is longer after TA in non-small cell NETs.
