Prospective evaluation of first-trimester screening strategy for preterm pre-eclampsia and its clinical applicability

J Hu1, J Gao1, J Liu1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric and Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, China.

Insights

The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening strategy effectively identifies preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) in Chinese women. Positive screening also indicates higher risk for other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Preterm pre-eclampsia (PE) poses significant risks to maternal and fetal well-being.
  • Effective screening strategies are crucial for early detection and management of PE.
  • The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) has developed a competing-risks model for PE screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of the FMF's preterm PE screening strategy in a Chinese population.
  • To assess the clinical applicability of this screening model in mainland China.
  • To analyze the model's predictive performance for a composite of placenta-associated adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of 10,899 singleton pregnancies in mainland China.
  • Measurement of mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), placental growth factor (PlGF), and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) at 11-13 weeks' gestation.
  • Individualized risk calculation using the FMF algorithm and analysis of screening efficiency for preterm PE and composite adverse outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The triple-marker model (MAP, UtA-PI, PAPP-A) achieved detection rates of 65.0% to 76.1% for preterm PE at 10-20% false-positive rates.
  • Detection rates for severe composite placenta-associated adverse outcomes ranged from 34.7% to 46.4% at the same false-positive rates.
  • Replacing or adding PlGF did not improve the model's performance; women screening positive for preterm PE had an increased risk of other adverse outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The FMF competing-risks model is effective for screening preterm PE in a mainland Chinese population.
  • Positive screening for preterm PE is associated with an increased risk of other placenta-associated pregnancy complications.
  • The FMF model demonstrates clinical applicability for preterm PE screening in China.
Abstract