Validation of ERICVA Risk Score as a Predictor of One Year Amputation-Free Survival of Patients with Critical Limb

Sara-Azhari Mohamed1, Navian Lee Viknaswaran2, Jonathan Doran3

  • 1Regenerative Medicine Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.

Insights

The ERICVA risk score shows fair validity for predicting amputation-free survival in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. A simplified version offers similar predictive power and can replace the full score.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Clinical Risk Stratification
  • Amputation Prevention

Background:

  • Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) poses a significant risk for amputation.
  • The ERICVA score was developed to predict amputation-free survival (AFS) in CLI patients.
  • External validation of the ERICVA score was lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To externally validate the ERICVA risk score system for predicting one-year amputation-free survival (AFS) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
  • To compare the predictive performance of the full ERICVA scale (11 parameters) and a simplified version (5 parameters).

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection from 179 CLI patients prescreened for a stem cell trial.
  • Validation of full and simplified ERICVA scores using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).
  • Chi-square tests and Kaplan-Meier survival curves analyzed risk group association with one-year AFS.

Main Results:

  • A significant association was found between ERICVA risk groups and one-year AFS (P=0.0007).
  • Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in AFS among risk groups (log-rank P < 0.001).
  • AUC for the full and simplified scores were 0.63 and 0.61, respectively; simplified score had higher specificity (0.92 vs 0.84).

Conclusions:

  • The ERICVA risk score demonstrates fair validity but is not a completely reliable predictor of one-year AFS in CLI patients.
  • The simplified ERICVA score performs comparably to the full score and is recommended for clinical use.
  • Further research may be needed to enhance the reliability of risk stratification for CLI patients.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management01:23

Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

During the postoperative period, it is crucial to focus on maintaining circulation, identifying and managing potential complications, and planning for discharge.Nursing AssessmentVital signs monitoring: Regularly monitor vital signs, including blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature, to detect early signs of complications such as bleeding and infection.Circulation assessment: Monitor pulses, perform Doppler assessments, and check capillary refill, color, temperature, and...
98
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation01:21

Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

Clinical manifestationsPeripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) manifests through a range of symptoms, from the characteristic intermittent claudication to atypical presentations and severe complications in advanced stages. Intermittent claudication, a hallmark symptom of PAD, presents as exercise-induced muscle pain that typically resolves within minutes of rest. This pain is reproducible and stems from inadequate blood flow, leading to the accumulation of lactic acid produced during anaerobic...
130
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management01:26

Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management

 The nursing management of a patient with peripheral artery disease (PAD) begins with a thorough assessment of the patient’s health history and clinical manifestations.AssessmentHealth History: Evaluate the patient’s history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of cardiovascular issues, and lifestyle factors such as dietary patterns, smoking, and physical activity.Physical Examination:Assess the affected extremity for decreased or absent peripheral pulses,...
127
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
956