Results of carotid artery stenting. Lessons learned in a Belgian 'real world' practice

Laura Kerselaers1, Sarah Gallala1, Dimitri Aerden1

  • 1Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Department of Vascular Surgery, Brussels, Belgium.

Insights

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) in high-risk patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) showed acceptable outcomes in a real-world, low-volume setting. This study found low rates of stroke and death, supporting CAS as a viable treatment option.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative for patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
  • Concerns exist regarding real-world stroke and death rates associated with CAS.
  • Belgian healthcare context limits CAS volume per center due to lack of reimbursement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the real-world outcomes of CAS in a low-volume center.
  • To assess stroke and death rates in patients undergoing CAS for carotid artery stenosis.
  • To compare findings with existing literature on CAS safety and efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 45 CAS procedures performed between January 2006 and May 2018.
  • Inclusion of patient demographics, treatment indications, and procedural outcomes.
  • Analysis of minor stroke, major stroke, and death rates.

Main Results:

  • 18% of patients had symptomatic stenosis, 82% had asymptomatic stenosis.
  • Overall minor stroke rate was 6.6% (3/45), with no major strokes or deaths.
  • Among asymptomatic patients, 2.7% (1/37) experienced a peri-operative minor stroke.

Conclusions:

  • CAS in high-risk patients for CEA demonstrates acceptable real-world outcomes comparable to literature.
  • Low-volume centers can achieve favorable results with rigorous quality control.
  • Centralization of CAS to experienced interventionalists is recommended for optimal safety and outcomes.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos