Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2025

Multimodality Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia
Published on: July 21, 2023
Evolution in the Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Elizabeth L Chou1, Linda J Wang1, Rachel M McLellan1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Objectives:
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening condition associated with dismal outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the evolution of presentation, treatment, and outcomes of AMI over the past two decades.
Methods:
AMI patients presenting at a single institution were reviewed (1993-2016). Venous thrombosis patients were excluded. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Patients were stratified by etiology and diagnosis date (before 2004 versus 2004 and later). Ordered logistic regression was performed for longitudinal temporal analysis.
Results:
303 patients were identified. AMI mechanisms included: embolic (49%), thrombotic (29%), and non-occlusive (NOMI) (22%). The majority were women (55%), 50% had atrial fibrillation, and 23% were on anticoagulation (AC) therapy. Mean age was 72±13 years. 345 procedures were performed in 242 patients: 321 open and 24 hybrid/endovascular. Among the 189 embolic/thrombotic patients who were managed operatively, 45% (n=85) underwent mesenteric revascularization while 39 (21%) had findings of non-survivable bowel necrosis (NSBN). Among the 104 patients who did not undergo revascularization, 64 (62%) died within 30-days compared to 36 out of 85 (42%) patients who were revascularized (P=0.01). 30-day mortality was 61% and stable over time (P=0.91); when stratified by AMI etiology, the thrombotic cohort had worse survival than embolic and NOMI patients (P=0.04). Since 2000, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of embolic AMI events (P=0.04). The percentage of patients who underwent operative management decreased also over time (P=0.01, 81% → 61%), which was correlated with an increasing number of patients being made comfort measures only (CMO) prior to surgical intervention (50% → 70%, P=0.02). The majority of patients (55%) were ultimately made CMO during their hospitalization. Predictors of 30-day mortality included a preoperative white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 25 K/ µL. (OR 3.0, P=0.002) and lactate ≥ 2.3 mmol/L (OR 2.8, P=0.045). NSBN predictors included WBC ≥ 24 K/ µL. (OR 3.4 P=0.03) and lactate ≥ 3.8 mmol/L (OR 3.6, P=0.04).
Conclusions:
Despite advances in critical care over the past 25 years, AMI continues to be associated with poor prognosis. The survival benefit observed in patients who undergo revascularization supports an aggressive approach towards early vascular intervention, although this requires further study. The importance of early diagnosis, prognostication and advanced directives is highlighted given the high morbidity, mortality and use of comfort measures associated with AMI.
Insights
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) remains a deadly condition with high mortality. Early revascularization may improve survival, but prognosis is poor, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and advanced directives.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a critical condition with significant mortality.
- Understanding the trends in presentation, treatment, and outcomes is vital for improving patient care.
- The study reviews a 23-year period to analyze these evolving factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the changes in presentation, treatment strategies, and outcomes of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) over two decades.
- To identify predictors of mortality and non-survivable bowel necrosis (NSBN).
- To assess the impact of early vascular intervention on patient survival.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 303 acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) patients (excluding venous thrombosis) from 1993-2016.
- Patients stratified by diagnosis date (pre-2004 vs. 2004+) and etiology (embolic, thrombotic, NOMI).
- Analysis of 30-day mortality, treatment procedures, and logistic regression for temporal trends and mortality predictors.
Main Results:
- Overall 30-day mortality was 61% and remained stable over time; thrombotic AMI had worse survival (P=0.04).
- Operative management decreased (81% to 61%), with increased comfort measures (CMO) (50% to 70%).
- Revascularization in embolic/thrombotic AMI patients showed improved survival (42% vs. 62% mortality, P=0.01); high WBC and lactate predicted mortality and NSBN.
Conclusions:
- Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) continues to have a poor prognosis despite critical care advances.
- Early vascular intervention (revascularization) appears to offer a survival benefit, warranting further investigation.
- Emphasize early diagnosis, prognostication, and advance care planning due to high morbidity and mortality.
More Related Videos
07:05Visualization of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Mesenteric Venules After Mesenteric Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Intravital Microscopy
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Spectral Characterization of Physiological and Malperfused Tissues
Published on: July 5, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...