Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Implantation of Total Artificial Heart in Congenital Heart Disease
Published on: July 18, 2014
T1 mapping and conditional survival in paediatric dilated cardiomyopathy with advanced heart failure
Shashi Raj1, Richa Kothari2, N Arun Kumar3
1Pediatric Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, NH Health City, Bengaluru, India.
Insights
Native T1 mapping did not predict survival in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy patients with advanced heart failure. This cardiac MRI technique, assessing myocardial fibrosis, showed no significant difference between survivors and those who died.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial fibrosis is a known predictor of adverse events in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement is used to detect myocardial fibrosis.
- Native T1 mapping offers a non-contrast method to assess myocardial tissue characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of native T1 mapping in assessing myocardial fibrosis and predicting conditional survival in children and adolescents with advanced heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy.
- To determine if native T1 values can differentiate outcomes in this pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-cohort study of patients aged 21 years or younger with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy (LVEF ≤ 45%, NYHA class ≥ 2) who underwent CMR.
- Native T1 mapping was performed prior to contrast administration.
- Conditional survival (≥ 6 months post-CMR) was assessed, including NYHA class and time to event (death or heart transplantation).
Main Results:
- Fifty-seven patients (mean age 11.7 ± 6.1 years) were included, with a median NYHA Class III and LVEF of 25%.
- The median native T1 was elevated at 1351 ms.
- No significant difference in native T1 values was observed between patients who survived and those who died; multilevel regression analysis failed to predict 6-month conditional survival.
Conclusions:
- Native T1 mapping, as assessed in this study, did not prove to be a reliable predictor of conditional survival in pediatric patients with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy.
- Further research may be needed to explore other CMR parameters or refine native T1 mapping techniques for prognostic value in this population.
Abstract:
Myocardial fibrosis is associated with adverse events in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiac MRI with late gadolinium enhancement can detect myocardial fibrosis. We evaluated the conditional survival of children and adolescents based on native T1 mapping (combined proton signal from myocytes and interstitium prior to contrast administration by the measurement of myocardial and blood relaxation time) as a means to assess myocardial fibrosis. This retrospective case-cohort over a 3-year period included all consecutive patients (aged ≤ 21 years) with advanced heart failure from dilated cardiomyopathy (echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% and NYHA class ≥ 2) who underwent cardiac MRI.Conditional survival (follow-up ≥ 6 months after cardiac MRI) was assessed to include NYHA functional class and time to event (death or heart transplantation). A total of 57 patients (mean age 11.7 ± 6.1 years; 58% male) had a median NYHA Class III (31/57) and median left ventricular ejection fraction 25% (20-38%). Survival data were available in 82% patients (46/57) and the crude mortality rate was 24% (11/46) and one patient (2%) underwent heart transplantation. The median native T1 was elevated at 1351 ms (95% CI 1332, 1394) and it showed no difference between the groups who survived to those who died. Performing a multilevel regression analysis on prognosis failed to predict 6-month conditional survival.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

