Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Assessment of binocular fixational eye movements including cyclotorsion with split-field binocular scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Journal of vision·2022

Same author

Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria.

Journal of eye movement research·2021

Same author

Binocular advantages for parafoveal processing in reading.

Vision research·2018

Same author

Using a dichoptic moving window presentation technique to investigate binocular advantages during reading.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2016

Same author

Does text contrast mediate binocular advantages in reading?

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2016

Same author

Binocular advantages in reading.

Current biology : CB·2014

Same journal

Effects of Surface Texture and Color on the Visuo-Tactile Perception of Polyurethane Synthetic Leather for Automotive Seats.

Journal of eye movement research·2026

Same journal

Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess-Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility Evaluation.

Journal of eye movement research·2026

Same journal

Reading to Translate or Translating to Read? Modeling Translators' Eye Movements with Multilingual Pre-Trained Models.

Journal of eye movement research·2026

Same journal

Correlation Between Accommodative Facility and Light-Evoked Pupil Responses in Individuals with History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Journal of eye movement research·2026

Same journal

An Eye-Tracking and Forecasting Experiment on Consumer Purchasing Decisions Through Product Reviews.

Journal of eye movement research·2026

Same journal

Cognitive Mechanisms of Referential Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Russian by Chinese Learners: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.

Journal of eye movement research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Do standard optometric measures predict binocular coordination during reading?

Joëlle Joss¹, Stephanie Jainta¹

¹Institute of Optometry, University of Applied Sciences, Northwestern Switzerland.

Journal of Eye Movement Research

|April 8, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Standard optometric tests have limited predictive power for binocular coordination during reading. While some associations exist, the efficiency of these tests in predicting complex reading behaviors is low.

Keywords:

binocular coordination eye movement eye tracking fixation disparity heterophoria individual differences reading saccade disconjugacy vergence drift

More Related Videos

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes

Published on: March 3, 2023

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Neuroscience
Human Factors

Background:

Binocular eye movements are crucial for effective reading and visual processing.
Asthenopia and reading difficulties often prompt standard optometric assessments of binocular vision.
Existing optometric tests evaluate parameters like heterophoria, accommodative and vergence facility, AC/A-ratio, and near point of convergence (NPC).

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the predictive value of standard optometric measures for binocular coordination during reading.
To determine the relationship between common optometric tests and dynamic/static binocular eye movement parameters in a reading context.
To evaluate the efficiency of extrapolating optometric test results to complex reading tasks.

Main Methods:

Recorded binocular eye movements in 65 volunteers using an EyeLink II system during a standard reading task.
Employed linear regression analyses to correlate optometric measures (heterophoria, facility, AC/A, NPC, symptoms) with binocular coordination parameters.
Analyzed relationships between saccade disconjugacy, vergence drift, fixation disparity, and first fixation duration with optometric predictors.

Main Results:

Vergence facility weakly predicted saccade disconjugacy (15% variance).
Vergence facility, AC/A-ratio, and symptom scores predicted vergence drift (31% variance).
Heterophoria, vergence facility, and NPC explained 31% of fixation disparity; symptom scores showed minor associations with first fixation duration (18%).

Conclusions:

Weak to moderate relationships were found between optometric measures and binocular coordination during reading.
Dynamic parameters correlated with vergence-related tests, while static parameters (fixation disparity) related to heterophoria.
Optometric tests demonstrated low efficiency in predicting binocular coordination during reading, questioning their direct extrapolation to complex reading tasks.