Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fractures: Bone Repair01:27

Fractures: Bone Repair

4.2K
Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
4.2K
Fatigue01:21

Fatigue

341
Fatigue occurs when materials rupture under repeated or fluctuating loads, even at stress levels far below their static breaking strength. It typically results in brittle failure, even for ductile materials. It is a critical consideration in designing machines and structural components subjected to repetitive or varying loads. The nature of these loadings can range from fluctuating loads like unbalanced pump impellers causing vibrations to repeatedly bending a thin steel rod wire back and forth...
341
Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials01:24

Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials

3.1K
Brittle materials, including glass, cast iron, and stone, exhibit unique characteristics. They fracture without considerable change in their elongation rate, indicating that their breaking and ultimate strength are equivalent. Such materials also show lower strain levels at the point of rupture. The failure in brittle materials predominantly results from normal stresses, as evidenced by the rupture created along a surface perpendicular to the applied load. These materials do not display...
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fragility Fracture Network Position on Unrestricted Weight-Bearing After Hip Fracture Surgery.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Functional Outcomes After Nonoperative Management in Older Adult Low-Energy Stable and Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Retrospective Review of 158 Patients.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2024
Same author

Hip Fracture Patterns, Hospital Course, and Mortality Differ Between Males and Females.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2024
Same author

Three-Dimensional Mapping of Scapular Body, Neck, and Glenoid Fractures.

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2023
Same author

Exposing the Care Conundrum of Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures in Older Adults: A Review of 322 Patients.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2023
Same author

Outcomes After Revision Fixation With Cement Augmentation for Failed Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation in Older Adult Patients.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

13.7K

Fracture Risk Assessment: An Update.

Andrew J Cozadd1, Lisa K Schroder2,3, Julie A Switzer2,3

  • 1TRIA Orthopedic Center, Bloomington, Minnesota.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|April 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Accurate fracture risk identification is improving with new tools. Combining dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with trabecular bone score (TBS) and clinical risk calculators enhances patient stratification for osteoporosis therapies.

More Related Videos

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests
08:36

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests

Published on: November 30, 2017

9.7K
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
12:04

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
06:59

Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents

Published on: August 14, 2018

13.7K
Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests
08:36

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests

Published on: November 30, 2017

9.7K
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
12:04

Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography

Published on: December 9, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Osteoporosis research
  • Bone health assessment
  • Clinical data analysis

Background:

  • Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for osteoporosis screening and treatment monitoring due to its accessibility and low radiation.
  • Fracture risk assessment has advanced with increased clinical data and specialized tools.
  • Trabecular bone score (TBS) analyzes DXA images to assess bone microarchitecture, serving as an independent fracture risk factor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore advanced methods for identifying individuals at high risk of fractures.
  • To evaluate the utility of trabecular bone score (TBS) in refining fracture risk assessment.
  • To determine the benefits of combining different fracture risk assessment tools.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment.
  • Employing trabecular bone score (TBS) software to analyze lumbar spine DXA images for bone microarchitecture.
  • Integrating data from established fracture risk assessment tools (e.g., FRAX, Garvan, QFracture) that consider multiple clinical factors.

Main Results:

  • Trabecular bone score (TBS) aids in stratifying fracture risk, particularly for individuals with osteopenic BMD or unexplained fractures.
  • Fracture risk assessment tools provide absolute risk estimates and differentiate risk among patients with similar BMDs.
  • A combined approach using DXA, TBS, and clinical risk calculators improves the accuracy of identifying high-risk patients.

Conclusions:

  • Advanced tools like TBS and clinical risk calculators significantly enhance fracture risk identification.
  • Combining DXA-based TBS with clinical risk assessment tools offers a more comprehensive approach to patient stratification.
  • Integrated assessment strategies are crucial for optimizing the selection of patients for osteoporosis therapies.