Prognostic Significance of Pulmonary Multifocal Neuroendocrine Proliferation With Typical Carcinoid

The clinical significance of multifocal pulmonary neuroendocrine proliferation (MNEP), including tumorlets and pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, in association with typical carcinoid (TC), is still debated.

We evaluated a retrospective series of TC with long-term follow-up data prospectively collected from 2 institutions and compared the outcome between TC alone and MNEP plus TC. Several baseline covariates were imbalanced between the MNEP plus TC and TC groups; therefore, we conducted 1:1 propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting in the full sample. In the matched group, the association of clinical, respiratory, and work-related factors with the group was determined through univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis.

A total of 234 TC patients underwent surgery: 41 MNEP plus TC (17.5%) and 193 TC alone (82.5%). In the MNEP plus TC group, older age (P < .001), peripheral tumors (P = .0032), smaller tumor size (P = .011), and lymph node spread (P = .02) were observed compared with the TC group. Relapses occurred in 8 patients in the MNEP plus TC group (19.5%) and 7 in the TC group (3.6%). After matching, in 36 pairs of patients, a significantly higher 5-year progression-free rate was observed for the TC group (P < .01). Similar results were observed using inverse probability of treatment weighting in the full sample. The odds of being in the MNEP plus TC group was higher for those with work-related exposure to inhalant agents (P = .008), asthma or bronchitis (P = .002), emphysema, fibrosis, and inflammatory status (P = .032), or micronodules on the chest computed tomography scan and respiratory insufficiency (P = .036).

The association with MNEP seems to represent a clinically and prognostic relevant factor in TC. Hence, careful preoperative workup, systematic pathologic evaluation, including nontumorous lung parenchyma, and long-term postoperative follow-up should be recommended in these patients.