Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Suspecting Intussusception and Recurrence Risk Stratification Using Clinical Data and Plain Abdominal Radiographs
Ye Rim Oh1, Bo Kyung Je2, Chaeyoun Oh3
1Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Plain abdomen radiographs can help diagnose intussusception in children. Specific X-ray findings, like absent ascending colon gas, may indicate recurrence after treatment, suggesting closer observation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Gastrointestinal Imaging
- Abdominal Pain Diagnostics
Background:
- Plain abdomen radiograph (AXR) is frequently used for differential diagnosis in pediatric patients presenting with abdominal pain.
- Ultrasonography is the gold standard for diagnosing intussusception, but AXR remains a common initial imaging modality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze AXR findings and clinical data in pediatric intussusception patients.
- To identify early AXR characteristics associated with intussusception diagnosis and recurrence after reduction.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 398 pediatric patients diagnosed with intussusception (ICD-10 code K56.1) between 2011 and 2018.
- Evaluation of six AXR features: absent ascending colon gas, absent transverse colon gas, target sign, meniscus sign, mass, and ileus.
- Comparison of clinical data and AXR features between patients with single intussusception episodes and those with recurrence after air reduction.
Main Results:
- Absent ascending colon gas was the most common AXR finding in intussusception (63.9%), followed by mass (29.1%).
- All six evaluated AXR features were more frequent in the recurrence group.
- Absent transverse colon gas showed the strongest association with recurrence (odds ratio, 2.964; p=0.008).
Conclusions:
- Absence of ascending colon gas is the most frequent AXR finding in pediatric intussusception.
- The presence of specific AXR findings, particularly absent transverse colon gas, may predict recurrence.
- Extended observation after reduction is recommended for intussusception patients with suggestive AXR findings to monitor for recurrence.
More Related Videos
07:41Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.