Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

412
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
412
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.6K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What has happened to the open surgery for rectal cancer in Japan?

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2026
Same author

How reliable and generalisable are the results of the LASRE trial?

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2025
Same author

Lymph Node Yield and Lymph Node Ratio for Prognosis of Long-Term Survival in Gastric Carcinoma.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Treatment Quality of Rectal Cancer Patients in Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers Versus Non-Certified Hospitals: A Comparative Analysis.

Cancers·2025
Same author

Assessing neoadjuvant therapy recommendations in 19 national and international guidelines for rectal cancer.

Techniques in coloproctology·2024
Same author

Challenges and solutions in 3D printing for oncology: a narrative review.

Chinese clinical oncology·2024
Same journal

The Prevalence of Hospitalized Cases of Necrotizing Fasciitis: Anatomical Distribution, Amputations, and In-Hospital Mortality, 2019-2024.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same journal

Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: Detection, Stroke Risk, and Treatment.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same journal

Fewer Premature Births After Assisted Reproduction.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same journal

Femoral Artery Pseudoaneurysm Due to Stent Fracture in PAOD.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same journal

Pain-Adapted Full Weight-bearing After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Multicenter, Pragmatic, Single-armed Prospective Study.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same journal

Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Risk Adjustment Was Imprecise

Pawel Mroczkowski

    Deutsches Arzteblatt International
    |April 9, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary

    No abstract available in PubMed .

    More Related Videos

    Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
    13:04

    Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

    Published on: September 19, 2012

    12.3K
    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
    09:36

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

    Published on: June 4, 2020

    3.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.3K
    Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
    13:04

    Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

    Published on: September 19, 2012

    12.3K
    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
    09:36

    Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip

    Published on: June 4, 2020

    3.4K