Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
15.7K
A randomized clinical study to compare implant stability and bone loss using early loading protocol in two implant
Rani Ranabhatt1, Kamleshwar Singh1, Ramashanker Siddharth1
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
|April 9, 2021
Summary
Dental implant design significantly impacts early loading outcomes. Group X implants, featuring flared crest modules and buttress threads, demonstrated superior implant stability and reduced bone loss compared to Group A implants.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Oral Surgery
Background:
- Early loading protocols in dental implantology aim to accelerate treatment timelines.
- Implant design is a critical factor influencing osseointegration and long-term success.
- Understanding the biomechanical properties of different implant designs is essential for predictable clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of two distinct dental implant designs on implant stability and marginal bone loss.
- To evaluate the clinical performance of implants with flared crest modules and buttress threads versus parallel crest modules and V-shaped threads under early loading conditions.
Main Methods:
- An in vivo comparative study involving 40 subjects with missing single posterior mandibular teeth.
- Randomized allocation into two groups (Group X and Group A) for early loading at 6 weeks.
- Assessment of implant stability using Ostell measurements and evaluation of crestal bone loss via intraoral periapical radiographs analyzed with ImageJ software at multiple time points.
Main Results:
- Group X implants exhibited significantly less mean bone loss (1.51 ± 0.20 mm at 6 weeks, 2.11 ± 0.21 mm at 3 months, 2.13 ± 0.21 mm at 6 months) compared to Group A (1.79 ± 0.16 mm at 6 weeks, 2.92 ± 0.23 mm at 3 months, 2.95 ± 0.23 mm at 6 months).
- Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in bone loss between the groups at all measured intervals (P < 0.05).
- Group A showed highly significant bone loss at 6 months (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- The dental implant design of Group X, characterized by flared crest modules and buttress threads, offers superior implant stability and promotes reduced marginal bone loss.
- This specific implant design may be more advantageous for early loading protocols in the mandible.
- Further research could explore long-term outcomes and biomechanical analyses of these implant designs.

