Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
Effects of Message Framing on Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge and Intentions Related to Primary HPV Testing
Shannon N Ogden1, Emily A Leskinen2, Elizabeth A Sarma3
1Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brief public health messaging significantly boosted cervical cancer screening intentions and knowledge for primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. Messaging effectiveness was consistent regardless of whether it used gain- or loss-framed language.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Communication
- Gynecologic Oncology
Background:
- Primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening in the US, but uptake remains low.
- Gain- and loss-framed messaging may influence health behaviors, but evidence is mixed for cervical cancer screening and absent for HPV testing.
- Understanding factors that increase screening intentions for primary HPV testing is crucial for improving cervical cancer prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of gain- versus loss-framed messaging on cervical cancer screening knowledge and intentions related to primary HPV testing.
- To assess the impact of brief public health messaging on awareness and beliefs about HPV testing for cervical cancer screening.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 365 females aged 21-65 who received either gain- or loss-framed messages about cervical cancer screening.
- Pretest and posttest measures assessed cervical cancer knowledge, beliefs, and intentions regarding primary HPV testing.
- Generalized estimating equations were used to model message and framing effects, controlling for demographic factors and baseline measures.
Main Results:
- Messaging significantly increased HPV-related screening intentions (aOR: 2.4), knowledge (aOR: 1.7), perceived effectiveness (aOR: 4.3), and preference for HPV screening (aOR: 3.2).
- These positive impacts were observed regardless of message framing (gain vs. loss).
- No significant interaction between message framing and outcomes was found, indicating framing did not alter effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Brief public health messaging effectively enhances knowledge, beliefs, and intentions for primary HPV testing for cervical cancer screening.
- Message framing (gain vs. loss) did not significantly influence the effectiveness of the messaging.
- Messaging campaigns, potentially combined with other strategies, can be a valuable tool to increase the uptake of primary HPV testing.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
10:26RNAscope for In situ Detection of Transcriptionally Active Human Papillomavirus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: March 11, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...