Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

06:26
Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
596
Frozen elephant trunk technique with different proximal landing zone for aortic dissection
Dmitri S Panfilov1, Boris N Kozlov1, Andrey S Pryakhin1
1Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
|April 13, 2021
Summary
The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure showed no significant early outcome differences between proximal landing zones 2 and 3. Midterm results suggest proximalization may improve false lumen thrombosis, impacting reintervention rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Aortic dissection requires complex surgical interventions.
- The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure is a key technique for managing extensive aortic dissections.
- Optimizing FET landing zones is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate early and midterm outcomes of the FET procedure based on different proximal landing zones.
- To compare the incidence of complications and false lumen thrombosis between Zone 2 (Z2) and Zone 3 (Z3) FET landing zones.
- To assess the impact of proximal landing zone selection on reintervention rates and overall survival.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 44 patients with Type A and B aortic dissections undergoing FET procedure.
- Patients were categorized into Zone 2 (Z2) and Zone 3 (Z3) proximal landing zone groups.
- Outcomes including stroke, delirium, spinal cord ischemia, mortality, false lumen thrombosis, and reintervention rates were monitored.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in early outcomes (stroke, delirium, spinal cord ischemia, 30-day mortality) between Z2 and Z3 groups.
- Comparable 2-year overall survival (61.6% vs 64.2%) and freedom from reintervention (74.1% vs 91.7%) between groups.
- Significantly higher complete false lumen thrombosis rate observed in the Z3 group by 24 months (77% vs 60%).
Conclusions:
- The FET procedure demonstrates comparable early safety and efficacy between Zone 2 and Zone 3 proximal landing zones.
- Proximalization of the FET landing zone (Z2) may be associated with improved false lumen thrombosis in the midterm.
- Further investigation is warranted to fully elucidate the long-term implications of FET landing zone selection on aortic remodeling and reintervention necessity.

