Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Characterizing sensitivity and coverage of clinical WGS as a diagnostic test for genetic disorders
Yan Sun1, Fengxia Liu2,3, Chunna Fan2,3
1BGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Background:
Due to its reduced cost and incomparable advantages, WGS is likely to lead to changes in clinical diagnosis of rare and undiagnosed diseases. However, the sensitivity and breadth of coverage of clinical WGS as a diagnostic test for genetic disorders has not been fully evaluated.
Methods:
Here, the performance of WGS in NA12878, the YH cell line, and the Chinese trios were measured by assessing their sensitivity, PPV, depth and breadth of coverage using MGISEQ-2000. We also compared the performance of WES and WGS using NA12878. The sensitivity and PPV were tested using the family-based trio design for the Chinese trios. We further developed a systematic WGS pipeline for the analysis of 8 clinical cases.
Results:
In general, the sensitivity and PPV for SNV/indel detection increased with mean depth and reached a plateau at an ~ 40X mean depth using down-sampling samples of NA12878. With a mean depth of 40X, the sensitivity of homozygous and heterozygous SNPs of NA12878 was > 99.25% and > 99.50%, respectively, and the PPV was 99.97% and 98.96%. Homozygous and heterozygous indels showed lower sensitivity and PPV. The sensitivity and PPV were still not 100% even with a mean depth of ~ 150X. We also observed a substantial variation in the sensitivity of CNV detection across different tools, especially in CNVs with a size less than 1 kb. In general, the breadth of coverage for disease-associated genes and CNVs increased with mean depth. The sensitivity and coverage of WGS (~ 40X) was better than WES (~ 120X). Among the Chinese trios with an ~ 40X mean depth, the sensitivity among offspring was > 99.48% and > 96.36% for SNP and indel detection, and the PPVs were 99.86% and 97.93%. All 12 previously validated variants in the 8 clinical cases were successfully detected using our WGS pipeline.
Conclusions:
The current standard of a mean depth of 40X may be sufficient for SNV/indel detection and identification of most CNVs. It would be advisable for clinical scientists to determine the range of sensitivity and PPV for different classes of variants for a particular WGS pipeline, which would be useful when interpreting and delivering clinical reports.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Genomics
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....

