Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Are small-for-gestational-age preterm infants at increased risk of overweight? Statistical pitfalls in overadjusting
Seham Elmrayed1, Amy Metcalfe2, Darren Brenner2
1Department of Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Seham.elmrayed1@ucalgary.ca.
Insights
Adjusting for body measures like height and weight can falsely link small for gestational age (SGA) infants to later overweight status. These adjustments may create misleading associations, not reflecting a true direct effect.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Growth and Development
- Nutritional Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Small for gestational age (SGA) is a predictor of adverse health outcomes.
- The relationship between SGA and childhood overweight is complex and may be influenced by confounding factors.
- Body measures at different time points can impact the observed association.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of adjusting for body measures (height and weight) on the association between SGA and overweight at three years of age.
- To determine if adjusting for intermediate body measures confounds the relationship between SGA and later overweight status.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (n=1089).
- Logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders, with separate adjustments for weight and height at 21 months.
- Marginal structural models (MSMs) were employed to estimate the direct effect of SGA on overweight, controlling for body measures.
Main Results:
- Crude and confounder-adjusted models showed no association between SGA and overweight.
- Adjusting for height alone showed a positive association (OR: 2.31), while adjusting for weight showed a significant positive association (OR: 6.60).
- MSMs, which held height and weight constant, found no direct effect of SGA on overweight (OR: 0.83 for height, OR: 0.71 for weight).
Conclusions:
- Adjusting for body measures can alter the observed association between SGA and overweight.
- Spurious associations between SGA and overweight can arise from adjusting for intermediate body measures.
- The direct effect of SGA on overweight at 3 years is not supported when accounting for body measures using MSMs.
Objective:
The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of adjusting for body measures on the association between small for gestational age (SGA) and overweight at 3 years.
Study Design:
Data were obtained from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (n = 1089). Logistic regression was used, to adjust for confounders with additional adjustments separately for weight and height at 21 months. Marginal structural models (MSMs) estimated the direct effect of SGA on overweight.
Results:
The crude and adjusted for confounders models yielded null associations between SGA and overweight. Adjusting for height yielded a positive association (odds ratio (OR): 2.31, 95% CI: 0.52-10.26) and adjusting for weight provided a significantly positive association (OR: 6.60, 95% CI: 1.10-37.14). The MSMs, with height and weight held constant, provided no evidence for a direct effect of SGA on overweight (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.14-5.01, OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.18-2.81, respectively).
Conclusion:
Adjusting for body measures can change the association between SGA and overweight, providing spurious estimates.
More Related Videos
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
05:44Author Spotlight: Collecting the Brain and Serum from the Same Mice Fetus to Study Brain Tumor Development
Published on: May 17, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Obesity