Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

24.2K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
24.2K
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

9.6K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
9.6K
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

12.1K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
12.1K
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

541
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
541
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

13.3K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
13.3K
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II01:21

Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II

7.7K
A rigid body is in static equilibrium when the net force and the net torque acting on the system are equal to zero.
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating Machine Learning with Musculoskeletal Simulation Improves OpenCap Video-Based Dynamics Estimation.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026
Same author

Video-Based Biomechanical Analysis Captures Disease-Specific Movement Signatures of Different Neuromuscular Diseases.

NEJM AI·2025
Same author

Video-based biomechanical analysis captures disease-specific movement signatures of different neuromuscular diseases.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

AddBiomechanics Dataset: Capturing the Physics of Human Motion at Scale.

Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision·2025
Same author

Marker Data Enhancement for Markerless Motion Capture.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2025
Same author

Effects of botulinum toxin on paraspinal muscle imbalance during spinal motions in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: Assessment using high-density electromyography.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.0K

A Dynamic Optimization Approach for Solving Spine Kinematics While Calibrating Subject-Specific Mechanical

Wei Wang1,2,3, Dongmei Wang4, Antoine Falisse2

  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|April 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel framework for spine kinematics using skin-mounted markers, accurately estimating joint stiffness. This method enhances the physiological realism of spinal motion simulations.

Keywords:
Force-dependent optimizationKinematics redundancyParameter estimationSpinal stiffnessSpine

More Related Videos

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.4K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

10.0K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.4K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate spine kinematics are crucial for understanding spinal mechanics and developing effective treatments.
  • Current methods for estimating spine kinematics and joint properties have limitations in accuracy and personalization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a new optimization framework for solving spine kinematics using skin-mounted markers.
  • To estimate subject-specific mechanical properties of intervertebral joints.
  • To improve the physiological representativeness of spinal motion simulations.

Main Methods:

  • A novel optimization framework was developed, enforcing dynamic consistency and personalizing spinal stiffness.
  • 3D reflective markers were placed on ten vertebrae of ten healthy volunteers during various spine motions.
  • Calculated spine kinematics were validated against biplanar X-rays and compared with traditional inverse kinematics (IK) methods.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method demonstrated high accuracy, with vertebral body position differences below 10.1 mm and joint orientation angle differences below [Formula: see text] compared to X-rays.
  • Spine kinematics, including lumbar rotation patterns and ranges, closely matched in vivo literature data.
  • The framework successfully estimated subject-specific spinal stiffness, showing patterns consistent with experimental findings and outperforming existing IK methods.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework provides a more accurate and personalized approach to analyzing spine kinematics and mechanical properties.
  • This method offers enhanced insight into spinal mechanics, improving the physiological relevance of simulations.
  • The findings support the potential of this framework for clinical applications and further research in spinal disorders.