Near-point Findings in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and in Typical Peers

Clinicians can better diagnose and manage vision problems of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) children by establishing a standard of care for this population. Results also reinforce the importance of a comprehensive binocular vision evaluation in all patients with ASD.

The purposes of this study were to compare near-point and ocular motility test findings in ASD children and typically developing (TD) peers and to compare findings among ASD children by level of verbal communication.

Sixty-one children and adolescents (ASD, 34; TD, 27) aged 9 to 17 years completed an eye examination protocol including tests of distance and near phoria, near point of convergence, near fusional convergence and divergence, accommodative response, and Northeastern State University College of Optometry oculomotor testing. Testing was completed through refractive correction. Parents of ASD children provided information regarding subjects' verbal communication level (nonverbal, uses short words, verbal).

Distance phoria did not differ significantly between groups. Near phoria of ASD subjects was more exophoric (difference, 2.8 prism diopters). Mean near point of convergence break and recovery were 7.0 and 8.02 cm, respectively, in ASD subjects and 2.19 and 3.99 cm in TD subjects. Near fusional divergence and convergence showed no significant difference. Autism spectrum disorder subjects had significantly poorer stereoacuity (P < .0001) and, on Northeastern State University College of Optometry Oculomotor Testing, reduced fixation, poorer accuracy and stamina/ability, and increased head and body movement. Monocular estimation method retinoscopy results did not differ significantly between ASD and TD subjects. No significant differences in phoria, near point of convergence, and near fusional divergence or convergence were observed between ASD subgroups (nonverbal, uses short words, verbal).

Autism spectrum disorder children are more likely to show receded near point of convergence, poor fixation, inaccurate saccades, erratic pursuits, and exophoric posture. These differences occur, regardless of reported verbal communication level.