Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.4K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

8.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
8.0K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.7K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The anticipation of imminent events is time-scale invariant.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Top-down and bottom-up neuroscience as collections of practices.

Nature reviews. Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the human brain.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

A Dataset of 108 Novel Noun-Noun Compound Words with Active and Passive Interpretation.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same author

An equivalent illuminant analysis of lightness constancy with physical objects and in virtual reality.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Neural signatures of temporal anticipation in human cortex represent event probability density.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K

Two sources of uncertainty independently modulate temporal expectancy.

Matthias Grabenhorst1, Laurence T Maloney2, David Poeppel3,2,4

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Max-Planck-Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt 60322, Germany; m.g@ae.mpg.de.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary

The brain dynamically models temporal uncertainty for anticipation. New findings reveal how discrete event probability and timing influence expectancy, independent of sensory input modality.

Keywords:
anticipationcatch trialprobability learningreaction timetemporal–probabilistic inference

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

905
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

905
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Anticipatory behaviors rely on modeling temporal uncertainty.
  • Two key uncertainties exist: discrete event occurrence and continuous event timing.
  • Neural mechanisms for modeling these uncertainties and their interaction are unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how the brain models discrete and continuous temporal uncertainty.
  • Examine the interaction between these uncertainty types in anticipation.
  • Challenge existing assumptions about how discrete probability affects event expectancy over time.

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral experiments assessing event expectancy.
  • Modeling approaches including hazard rate (HR) and probability density function (PDF).
  • Testing across visual and auditory sensory modalities.

Main Results:

  • Discrete probability's effect on event expectancy increases dynamically over time, contrary to fixed effect assumptions.
  • This dynamic pattern is independent of continuous timing uncertainty.
  • The hazard rate (HR) model fails to explain behavior; a probability density function (PDF) model is proposed and validated.
  • Findings are consistent across visual and auditory stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • The brain employs distinct, modality-independent mechanisms to model discrete and continuous temporal uncertainties.
  • Event expectancy is better explained by a probability density function than the hazard rate.
  • These insights advance understanding of fundamental anticipatory processes and their neural basis.