Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intercellular bridges and factors determining their patterns in the grasshopper testis.

J G Carlson1, M A Handel

  • 1Department of Zoology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-0810.

Journal of Morphology
|May 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how cells in grasshopper testes connect through structures called intercellular bridges. Using microscopy, researchers observed that these bridges form in different patterns depending on the stage of cell development. In early stages, cells are connected by a central structure called a fusome, which breaks down later to form chain-like connections. The study also found that shifts in cell orientation during anaphase may influence how these bridges form. While intercellular bridges are present in later stages of cell development, the exact timing of their formation remains unclear. The researchers suggest these structures may help maintain synchronization and fertility, but they do not claim fusomes are essential for all processes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Depletion of SMC5/6 sensitizes male germ cells to DNA damage.

Molecular biology of the cell·2018
Same author

New point mutation in Golga3 causes multiple defects in spermatogenesis.

Andrology·2013
Same author

Intensity effects of ultraviolet radiation of wavelength 2537 A on mitosis in the grasshopper neuroblast.

Journal of cellular and comparative physiology·2010
Same author

The alteration of nerve cell differentiation in the grasshopper embryo by treatment with ultraviolet radiation.

The Anatomical record·2010
Same author

Protoplasmic viscosity changes in different regions of the grasshopper neuroblast during mitosis.

The Biological bulletin·2010
Same author

Immediate mitotic effects of ultraviolet radiation of wavelength 2180 A.

The Anatomical record·2010

Area of Science:

  • Developmental biology
  • Cell biology
  • Insect physiology

Background:

The organization of cell connections in insect testes is a topic of ongoing investigation. Prior research has shown how cells in developing tissues communicate through structures like fusomes and intercellular bridges. However, the exact mechanisms governing the formation and function of these structures in grasshoppers remain unclear. No prior work had resolved how fusomes transition into intercellular bridges during spermatogenesis. This gap motivated a closer examination of the testis structure in Chortophaga viridifasciata. Researchers have already established that fusomes are essential for cell communication in some insect species. But the role of these structures in maintaining synchrony and fertility in grasshoppers is still debated. This uncertainty drove the need to analyze both the spatial and temporal dynamics of these connections. The study aimed to clarify how these structures form and what their functional implications are.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study sought to investigate the structure and function of intercellular bridges in the grasshopper testis. Specifically, the researchers focused on how these bridges form and how they contribute to cell communication and development. The motivation for this work came from the lack of detailed information about fusome dynamics in Chortophaga viridifasciata. The authors aimed to determine whether fusomes persist or break down during different stages of spermatogenesis. They also wanted to understand how shifts in cell orientation during anaphase affect bridge formation. Another goal was to identify the timing of intercellular bridge formation in spermatids. The study's approach combined microscopic imaging with detailed anatomical analysis. The ultimate aim was to clarify the role of these structures in maintaining developmental synchrony and fertility.

Keywords:
Intercellular bridgesGrasshopper testisSpermatogenesisCell communication

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose fusomes may contribute to developmental synchrony and fertility by maintaining central connections between cells.

The central fusome in secondary spermatogonia breaks down into individual interzonal bodies, forming chain linkages in primary spermatocytes.

Shifts in cell orientation during anaphase appear to determine whether bridges form centrally or in a chain pattern.

The study found no evidence to determine when bridges form in spermatids, suggesting it may occur after meiotic divisions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The researchers used both light and electron microscopy to study intercellular bridges in grasshopper testes. They examined expressed whole cells, either living or fixed and stained, as well as tissue sections. This allowed them to observe the spatial organization of cells within cysts. The study focused on secondary spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes, and spermatids. In secondary spermatogonia, the fused interzonal bodies were analyzed for their central positioning. The researchers also tracked how fusomes transition into chain linkages in primary spermatocytes. They investigated shifts in cell orientation during anaphase to determine how these affect bridge formation. No evidence was found to pinpoint when intercellular bridges form in spermatids. The study combined anatomical observations with functional interpretations to understand the role of these structures.

Main Results:

The secondary spermatogonia in each cyst are connected by central fusomes formed from incompletely cleaved cells. These fusomes appear to persist until anaphase, when shifts in cell orientation lead to chain linkages. In primary spermatocytes, the central fusome breaks down into individual interzonal body components. This breakdown results in a chain-like pattern of intercellular bridges. Spermatids also contain intercellular bridges, but the exact timing of their formation remains unclear. The study found no evidence that these bridges form during meiotic divisions. The central fusome in secondary spermatogonia is compact and centrally located. The researchers suggest this structure may play a role in maintaining developmental synchrony and fertility.

Conclusions:

The study concludes that intercellular bridges in grasshopper testes form through the breakdown of fusomes during anaphase. The central fusome in secondary spermatogonia appears to persist until this stage. The transition to chain linkages in primary spermatocytes is likely due to fusome disintegration. The timing of bridge formation in spermatids remains unresolved. The central fusome may contribute to synchrony and fertility, but this is speculative. The researchers propose that shifts in cell orientation during anaphase are responsible for bridge patterns. The study does not claim fusomes are essential for all developmental processes. The findings suggest a dynamic relationship between cell orientation and bridge formation.

The central fusome is compact and centrally located, possibly playing a role in synchronizing cell divisions and maintaining fertility.

The authors suggest fusomes may be important but do not claim they are essential for all developmental processes.