Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Structure and Function using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass-geometry in patients with no or nonobstructive coronary artery
You-Jung Choi1, Jun-Bean Park2,3, Chan Soon Park1,4
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Abnormal left ventricular (LV) geometry worsens prognosis in patients with no or nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). LV geometry assessment aids in risk stratification for these individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Echocardiography
Background:
- Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a primary noninvasive tool for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Many patients exhibit no or nonobstructive CAD on CCTA but have abnormal left ventricular (LV) geometry on echocardiography.
- The prognostic significance of combined CCTA and echocardiographic findings is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic implications of abnormal LV geometry in individuals with no or nonobstructive CAD.
- To determine if LV geometry assessment improves risk stratification in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- 5806 subjects with no or nonobstructive CAD (<50% luminal narrowing) on CCTA were analyzed.
- Abnormal LV geometry was defined by LV mass index and/or relative wall thickness.
- All-cause mortality was the primary outcome, assessed over a mean follow-up of 6.2 years.
Main Results:
- Abnormal LV geometry was present in 30.3% of subjects.
- Subjects with abnormal LV geometry had significantly higher all-cause mortality rates (2.32% vs 1.24%).
- Abnormal LV geometry independently predicted mortality (aHR 1.64, P=0.034) and worsened survival in both no CAD and nonobstructive CAD groups.
Conclusions:
- Abnormal LV geometry is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with no or nonobstructive CAD.
- Assessing LV geometry can enhance risk stratification for individuals identified by CCTA.
- These findings highlight the importance of evaluating LV structure alongside coronary imaging.
Background:
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used as a first-line noninvasive modality that frequently exhibits no or nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in clinical practice, along with abnormal left ventricular (LV) geometry on echocardiography. However, the combined prognostic value of these findings has not been well elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of abnormal LV geometry in individuals with no or nonobstructive CAD.
Methods:
A total of 5806 subjects with no CAD or nonobstructive CAD (luminal narrowing < 50%) on CCTA were included in the study. The major exclusion criteria were structural heart disease and a history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization. Abnormal LV geometry on echocardiography was defined as LV mass index > 95 g/m2 in women and > 115 g/m2 in men, and/or relative wall thickness > 0.42. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.
Results:
A total of 5803 subjects without significant obstructive CAD (age, 56.6 ± 8.87 years; men, 3884 [66.9%]). Of them, 4045 (69.7%) subjects had normal LV geometry and 1758 (30.3%) had abnormal LV geometry respectively. During a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 1.48 years, 84 (1.44%) subjects died in the study population. Of these, 56 subjects were from the normal LV geometry group (1.24%) and 28 were from the abnormal LV geometry group (2.32%). Subjects with abnormal LV geometry had significantly worse survival rates (log-rank, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, abnormal LV geometry was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.58; p = 0.034). Moreover, abnormal LV geometry was significantly worse in survival when classified as those with no CAD (log-rank, p = 0.024) and nonobstructive CAD (Log-rank, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Abnormal LV geometry portends a worse prognosis in subjects with no or nonobstructive CAD. These findings suggest that LV geometry assessment can help improve the stratification of individuals with these CCTA findings.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...

