Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Experiences in academic publication among ENT trainees in the UK: results from a national survey
S Shahidi1, M S Osborne1, G M Jama2
1Department of Otolaryngology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Objective:
This study aimed to provide an objective means of identifying patterns in academic publication among ENT trainees during their higher surgical training.
Method:
A cross-sectional survey was distributed to ENT higher surgical trainees.
Results:
A total of 153 ENT specialty trainees participated, giving a response rate of 46.5 per cent. Across all years of training, the mean number of first author publications was three and the mean number of non-first author publications was two. For trainees at specialty trainee year 8 level, these figures were nine and five, respectively. Participants with doctoral degrees and those in academic programmes published more papers but the mean difference was only significant for the doctoral subgroup (p < 0.0001). Those with additional undergraduate degrees and those in less than full-time training had an overall lower number of publications.
Conclusion:
Participants in the current survey achieved a higher average number of academic publications than is presently required to successfully complete higher surgical training in ENT. It is hoped that these results act as a guide for trainees planning the research component of their training to ensure that they remain competitive at consultant interview.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Production Efficiency
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Feedback Inhibition
X-linked Traits
Mate Choice

