A soft elastomer alternative to polypropylene for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a preliminary study

We compared the impact of a mesh manufactured from the soft elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to that of a widely used lightweight polypropylene (PP) mesh. To achieve a similar overall device stiffness between meshes, the PDMS mesh was made with more material and therefore was heavier and less porous. We hypothesized that the soft polymer PDMS mesh, despite having more material, would have a similar impact on the vagina as the PP mesh.

PDMS and PP meshes were implanted onto the vaginas of 20 rabbits via colpopexy. Ten rabbits served as sham. At 12 weeks, mesh-vagina complexes were explanted and assessed for contractile function, histomorphology, total collagen, and glycosaminoglycan content. Outcome measures were compared using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis testing with appropriate post-hoc testing.

Relative to sham, vaginal contractility was reduced following the implantation of PP (p = 0.035) but not the softer PDMS (p = 0.495). PP had an overall greater negative impact on total collagen and glycosaminoglycan content, decreasing by 53% (p < 0.001) and 54% (p < 0.001) compared to reductions of 35% (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001) with PDMS. However, there were no significant differences in the contractility, collagen fiber thickness, total collagen, and glycosaminoglycan content between the two meshes.

Despite having a substantially higher weight, PDMS had a similar impact on the vagina compared to a low-weight PP mesh, implicating soft polymers as potential alternatives to PP. The notion that heavyweight meshes are associated with a worse host response is not applicable when comparing across materials.