Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Phase-targeted peripheral stimulation modulates cortical sensorimotor responses.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Lempel-Ziv complexity of simultaneous surface electromyography and magnetomyography during muscle fatigue.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Age, emotional burden and deep brain stimulation electrode location shape Parkinson's disease quality of life.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Cognitive and Emotional Determinants of Subthalamic Oscillations During Freezing While Turning in Parkinson's Disease.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

State-Dependent Neuromodulation Reveals Link Between Online and Offline Corticospinal Excitability.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
08:50

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: August 20, 2019

14.7K

Peripheral Electrical Stimulation Modulates Cortical Beta-Band Activity.

Laura J Arendsen1, Robert Guggenberger1, Manuela Zimmer1

  • 1Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|April 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Low-frequency peripheral electrical stimulation (PEMS) reduced beta power in the brain, suggesting it affects supraspinal pathways. Motor imagery did not significantly alter PEMS effects on brain activity.

Keywords:
electroencephalographynociceptionperipheral electrical stimulationsensorimotor rhythmstate-dependent stimulation

More Related Videos

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

13.3K
Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
11:11

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
08:50

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: August 20, 2019

14.7K
Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

13.3K
Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
11:11

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: September 23, 2017

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neurophysiology
  • Pain Research

Background:

  • Low-frequency peripheral electrical stimulation using a matrix electrode (PEMS) is known to modulate spinal nociceptive pathways.
  • The impact of PEMS on cortical oscillatory activity, particularly in different brain states, remains largely uninvestigated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of low-frequency PEMS (4 Hz) on cortical oscillatory activity in healthy participants.
  • To explore how PEMS influences brain activity during different cognitive states, specifically motor imagery (MI).

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) before and after stimulation.
  • Experiment 1 compared PEMS to sham stimulation.
  • Experiment 2 applied PEMS concurrently with or after motor imagery (MI) to assess brain state-dependent effects.

Main Results:

  • PEMS significantly decreased global resting-state beta power compared to sham stimulation (p=0.016).
  • This decrease was most pronounced over central and left frontal sensors.
  • Experiment 2 showed no significant difference in EEG power changes between concurrent and delayed PEMS, though frontal beta power may increase post-stimulation.

Conclusions:

  • Low-frequency PEMS demonstrates supraspinal effects, influencing cortical oscillatory activity.
  • Cognitive tasks like MI may modulate PEMS effects on beta activity.
  • Brain state-dependent PEMS could be a potential therapeutic approach for chronic pain, which is linked to altered beta activity.