Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
Published on: June 24, 2019
Evaluation of a general circulation model by the CERES Flux-by-cloud type simulator
Zachary A Eitzen1, Wenying Su2, Kuan-Man Xu2
1Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
This study evaluates the HadGEM2-A climate model using the CERES Flux-by-cloud type simulator. While the model shows compensating errors in cloud properties and radiative fluxes, it requires further refinement for accurate climate projections.
Area of Science:
- Climate modeling
- Atmospheric science
- Radiative transfer
Background:
- Accurate representation of clouds is crucial for climate models.
- The Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) provides valuable data for evaluating cloud properties and radiative fluxes.
- The HadGEM2-A model is a key component in climate change research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the HadGEM2-A climate model using the CERES Flux-by-cloud type simulator.
- To assess the model's ability to simulate cloud properties and their impact on top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes.
- To identify discrepancies between simulated and observed cloud characteristics and radiative budgets.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the CERES Flux-by-cloud type data product.
- Employed a simulator comprising a cloud generator, cloud property simulator, and radiative transfer model.
- Applied the simulator to specific regions (Southern Great Plains, Southeast Pacific) and globally (60° N - 60° S).
- Optimized calculations by identifying and reducing duplicate atmospheric profiles.
Main Results:
- In the Southern Great Plains, simulated cloud tops were higher, and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) was greater than observed, resulting in a compensating error for OLR.
- In the Southeast Pacific, simulated clouds were lower, less numerous, and had higher optical depths than observed, leading to higher albedo.
- Globally, the model simulated fewer clouds but with higher albedos for most cloud types, indicating a compensating error in the shortwave radiative budget.
Conclusions:
- The HadGEM2-A model exhibits compensating errors in simulating cloud properties and radiative fluxes in different regions.
- Discrepancies in cloud altitude, frequency, and optical depth contribute to inaccurate albedo and radiative budget simulations.
- Further model development is necessary to improve the representation of cloud processes and their radiative impacts for more reliable climate projections.
More Related Videos
09:55Surface Renewal: An Advanced Micrometeorological Method for Measuring and Processing Field-Scale Energy Flux Density Data
Published on: December 12, 2013
13:27Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface
Published on: June 8, 2015
Related Concept Videos
General External Flow Characteristics
Precipitation Processes
Boundary Layer Characteristics
Calculation of Electric Flux
Plane Potential Flows
Uniform...
Laminar and Turbulent Flow