Serum Levels of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Predict Tumor Response and Outcome to Immune

Sven H Loosen1,2, Joao Gorgulho3,4, Markus S Jördens1

  • 1Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Frontiers in Oncology
|April 19, 2021
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) can predict how well patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Low suPAR levels indicate a better response and survival in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, but predicting patient response remains a challenge.
  • Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a marker of immune activation, shows prognostic value in various cancers.
  • There is a need for reliable biomarkers to predict ICI treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate circulating suPAR levels as a novel predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients receiving ICI therapy for solid tumors.
  • To determine if suPAR levels can identify patients likely to respond favorably to ICI treatment.
  • To assess the association between suPAR levels and overall survival in patients undergoing ICI therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Serum suPAR levels were measured using ELISA in 87 solid tumor patients receiving ICI therapy and 32 healthy controls.
  • Measurements were taken at baseline and two time points during ICI treatment.
  • Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was employed to validate findings.

Main Results:

  • Solid tumor patients exhibited significantly higher baseline suPAR levels than healthy controls.
  • Low suPAR levels (pre- or during ICI treatment) correlated with favorable treatment response at 3 and 6 months.
  • Elevated suPAR levels (≥4.86 ng/ml) were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (160 days vs. 705 days).
  • Low baseline suPAR identified patients with ICI-related side effects, who also showed favorable outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Circulating suPAR levels serve as a novel, accessible biomarker for predicting ICI treatment response and patient outcomes.
  • suPAR measurements can aid in stratifying patients to identify optimal candidates for ICI therapy.
  • Implementation of suPAR into clinical practice could enhance personalized cancer treatment strategies.

Related Concept Videos