Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with left ventricular thrombus
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Günes Dogan1, Silvia Mariani1, Jasmin S Hanke1
1Department of Cardiac-, Thoracic-, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Insights
Left ventricular thrombus presence does not increase risks for patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Careful diagnosis and surgical strategies ensure comparable 30-day outcomes for LVAD recipients with or without LV thrombus.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Intra-cavitary left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a contraindication for LV assist device (LVAD) implantation due to thromboembolic risks.
- Limited data exists on LVAD outcomes in patients with preoperative LV thrombus diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of LVAD implantation in patients with and without preoperative LV thrombus.
- To compare 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis between these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 563 LVAD implantations between 2004 and 2018.
- LV thrombus diagnosis confirmed via imaging (CT, MRI, echocardiography) or intraoperative inspection.
- Primary endpoint: 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis.
Main Results:
- 12.8% of patients (n=72) had LV thrombus; they were younger, had reduced ejection fraction, and more dilated cardiomyopathy.
- Conventional sternotomy was preferred for LV thrombus patients, often receiving HeartMate II devices.
- 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis was comparable: 83.3% (with thrombus) vs. 80.9% (without thrombus) (P=0.5751).
Conclusions:
- LVAD implantation is safe and feasible in patients with preoperative LV thrombus.
- Appropriate diagnostic and intraoperative strategies lead to similar 30-day outcomes compared to patients without LV thrombus.
Abstract:
An intra-cavitary left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a relative contraindication to LV assist device (LVAD) implantation based on increased thromboembolic risks. Herein, we present our experience with LVAD patients with or without preoperative diagnosis of LV-thrombus. We retrospectively investigated 563 patients who received LVAD implantation between 2004 and 2018. Diagnosis of LV-thrombus was verified with computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, or intraoperative LV inspection. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival free of stroke and pump thrombosis. Overall, 72 patients (12.8%) had a diagnosis of LV-thrombus. They were younger (51 years; IQR:41-59), affected by severely reduced ejection fraction (15%; IQR:10-20), more often presenting with dilated cardiomyopathy (61.8%) and INTERMACS profile 1 (33.3%). Preoperative atrial fibrillation was frequent in patients without LV-thrombus (38.9%). Conventional sternotomy was the preferred approach in LV-thrombus patients (77.8%), based on more HMII implantations in these patients (41.7%). Survival free of strokes and pump thrombosis at 30 days was comparable (P = .5751) between patients with (83.3%) or without LV-thrombus (80.9%). LVAD implantation in patients with preoperative LV-thrombus is safe and feasible. When managed through correct diagnostic and intraoperative strategies including accurate inspection of the LV cavity, these patients show similar 30-day outcomes compared to patients without LV-thrombus.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

