Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Temporal Bone Presenting With Facial Nerve Paralysis: A 25-Year Experience.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Gastric Pull-Up Reconstruction for Advanced Hypopharyngeal Cancer.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Pedicled Scalp Reconstruction After Radiation Therapy.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Is splenic artery embolization beneficial when splenic angiography is negative? A multicenter observational study.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026
Same author

Salvage Laryngectomy With Primary Pharyngeal Closure and Flap Onlay Technique.

Journal of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Management of Malignant Parotid Tumors With Complete Facial Paralysis.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.7K

Reconstruction of the Mandibular Condyle.

Spencer R Anderson1, Kaitlynne Y Pak2, Aurora G Vincent3

  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|April 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Reconstructing the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condyle is complex, requiring careful consideration of disease, tumors, or trauma. Current methods using autologous and alloplastic materials are evolving with technological advances.

More Related Videos

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.7K
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.5K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • The mandibular condyle is crucial for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function, growth, and facial aesthetics.
  • Compromise of the TMJ can lead to significant functional, psychological, and aesthetic deficits.
  • Condylar reconstruction presents challenges due to disease, tumor resection, or trauma.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current methods for mandibular condyle reconstruction.
  • To discuss the use of autologous and alloplastic materials in condylar reconstruction.
  • To highlight recent technological advancements in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature on condylar reconstruction techniques.
  • Focus on autologous grafts and alloplastic implants.
  • Analysis of surgical approaches and emerging technologies.

Main Results:

  • No single gold-standard method exists for condylar reconstruction.
  • Autologous and alloplastic materials offer various reconstructive options.
  • Technological innovations are continuously improving outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Mandibular condyle reconstruction requires a multidisciplinary approach.
  • Material selection and surgical technique are critical for successful outcomes.
  • Ongoing research promises further advancements in TMJ reconstruction.