Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fluid Mosaic Model01:19

Fluid Mosaic Model

14.5K
Scientists identified the plasma membrane in the 1890s and its principal chemical components (lipids and proteins) by 1915. The model for plasma membrane structure, proposed in 1935 by Hugh Davson and James Danielli, was the first model to be widely accepted in the scientific community. The model was based on the plasma membrane's "railroad track" appearance in early electron micrographs. Davson and Danielli theorized that the plasma membrane's structure resembled a sandwich...
14.5K
The Fluid Mosaic Model01:34

The Fluid Mosaic Model

169.8K
The fluid mosaic model was first proposed as a visual representation of research observations. The model comprises the composition and dynamics of membranes and serves as a foundation for future membrane-related studies. The model depicts the structure of the plasma membrane with a variety of components, which include phospholipids, proteins, and carbohydrates. These integral molecules are loosely bound, defining the cell’s border and providing fluidity for optimal function.
169.8K
Characteristics of Fluids01:31

Characteristics of Fluids

779
Fluids differ from solids primarily in their molecular structure and stress response. Solids have tightly packed molecules with strong intermolecular forces, maintaining their shape and resisting deformation. In contrast, fluids have molecules spaced farther apart with weaker forces, allowing them to flow and deform easily.
Fluids, which include both liquids and gases, are substances that deform continuously under shearing stress. For example, water and oil are liquids with molecules that can...
779
Characteristics of Fluids01:20

Characteristics of Fluids

7.1K
When a force is applied parallel to the top surface of a solid, it resists the applied force due to the internal frictional forces between the layers of the solid known as shearing resistance. However, when the force is removed, the shearing forces restore the original shape of the solid. Other deformation forces also cause temporary changes in shape if the forces are not beyond a threshold magnitude. Solids tend to retain their shape, making the study of their rest and motion easier. Beyond...
7.1K
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity02:57

Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity

31.1K
Surface Tension
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
31.1K
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers01:08

Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers

2.6K
Step growth polymerization involves bi or multifunctional monomers. Bifunctional monomers react to form linear step growth polymers, whereas multifunctional monomers react to form non-linear or branched polymers.
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing three methodologies for network analysis of human [<sup>11</sup>C]glyburide whole-body PET data: d-networks, s-networks, and ΔPCC networks.

EJNMMI research·2025
Same author

Using Contactless Interfacial Rheology to Probe Interfacial Mechanics for Compositional Ripening.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Using cryo-SEM and EDS to investigate the stabilisation of oil-water interfaces in mixed aqueous-and-oil foams.

Soft matter·2024
Same author

Long term water trapping in Pickering emulsions undergoing compositional ripening.

Soft matter·2023
Same author

Interactions between interfaces dictate stimuli-responsive emulsion behaviour.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Atomic Force Microscopy of Phytosterol Based Edible Oleogels.

Gels (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

Nanopore sequencing with proteins: synchronization and dischronization of molecular dynamics simulations with laboratory and industrial developments.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Catanionics from biosurfactants and regular surfactants: miscibility and structure.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Adhesives with a thickness smaller than the fractocohesive length enhance adhesion.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Non-equilibrium phase transitions in hybrid Voronoi models of cell colonies.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Effects of methoxy substituents on self-assembly and gelation performance of benzamide-based organogelators.

Soft matter·2026
Same journal

Rheology of <i>Escherichia coli</i> suspensions with various bacterial morphologies and motion characteristics.

Soft matter·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

4.3K

Characterising soft matter using machine learning.

Paul S Clegg1

  • 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, UK. paul.clegg@ed.ac.uk.

Soft Matter
|April 21, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning significantly advances soft matter research, improving particle tracking and characterization. It also aids in glass research and the design of new composite materials by analyzing complex data.

More Related Videos

Environmental Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to Predict the Softening Behavior of Neural Implants
06:59

Environmental Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to Predict the Softening Behavior of Neural Implants

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.0K
Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
06:07

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials

Published on: April 25, 2019

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

4.3K
Environmental Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to Predict the Softening Behavior of Neural Implants
06:59

Environmental Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to Predict the Softening Behavior of Neural Implants

Published on: March 1, 2019

8.0K
Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
06:07

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials

Published on: April 25, 2019

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Soft Matter Physics
  • Materials Science
  • Computational Materials Science

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) is increasingly influential in materials research.
  • Soft matter systems present unique challenges for analysis and design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current applications and progress of machine learning in soft matter research.
  • To highlight successes and remaining challenges in ML-driven materials discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Application of ML, particularly convolutional neural networks, for particle tracking.
  • Utilizing ML for describing, classifying, and interpreting ordered particle arrangements.
  • Employing ML to quantify structure-property relationships in glass research.
  • Exploring ML for the design of composite soft materials.

Main Results:

  • ML demonstrates impressive performance in particle tracking, though challenges persist.
  • ML techniques successfully characterize ordered particle arrangements and provide interpretations.
  • ML has been decisive in identifying subtle correlations in glass structures related to rearrangements.
  • Emerging ML applications show promise in designing novel composite soft materials.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning is a transformative tool in soft matter research, enhancing analysis and discovery.
  • ML facilitates deeper understanding of material properties and accelerates the design of new materials.
  • Future work should focus on addressing ML limitations and expanding its role in materials design and extrapolation.