Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
American, European and international hypertension guidelines: Time to shake hands?
Christina Antza1, Ioannis Doundoulakis1,2, Stella Stabouli2,3
13rd Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University, Hypertension, Hypertension-24h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Center, Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Insights
Major hypertension guidelines differ on treatment initiation, leading to patient misclassification and confusion. These discrepancies impact cardiovascular risk assessment and treatment decisions for many individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Management
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Adhering to evidence-based medicine guidelines is crucial for effective hypertension treatment and preventing cardiovascular events.
- Current hypertension management relies on guidelines from major international societies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare recent hypertension guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH), and International Society of Hypertension (ISH).
- To identify key discrepancies in guideline recommendations regarding treatment initiation criteria (when, how, and in whom).
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of the latest ACC/AHA, ESC/ESH, and ISH hypertension guidelines.
- Focus on contrasting recommendations for initiating antihypertensive therapy.
Main Results:
- Significant disagreements exist among the three guidelines regarding the definition of hypertension, specifically cut-off blood pressure values.
- Divergent cut-off values can lead to misclassification of patients into different blood pressure phenotypes.
- Each guideline proposes distinct risk stratification scores for assessing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies in hypertension guidelines create confusion for both general practitioners and specialists.
- Poor agreement between guidelines and diagnostic tools may result in a substantial number of patients not receiving appropriate treatment.
- Harmonization of guidelines is needed to ensure consistent and optimal patient care.
Background:
Following evidence-based medicine through guidelines is the first step to successfully treat hypertension and prevent cardiovascular outcomes.
Methods:
This study compares the recommendations of the most recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) blood pressure and International Society of Hypertension (ISH) focusing on prevalent contrasts among guidelines on when, how and in whom start the treatment, which is a major health implications of guidelines.
Results:
The three guidelines disagree for the cut-off values in the definition of hypertension. Due to the different cut-off values of BP at the definition of hypertension, a patient may be misclassified to one of the four phenotypes of BP from office and out of office measurements, based to which guidelines are followed by the physicians. In addition to this, each society propose different risk score to evaluate the cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension.
Conclusion:
These differences cause a confusion not only to the general practitioners, but also the hypertension experts about the correct approach. The poor agreement between guidelines and diagnostic tools implies a huge number of patients remained unknown whether they should receive treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

