Related Experiment Video For Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Evaluation of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for endometrial carcinoma histological features: a comparative
Nan Meng1,2, Xuejia Wang3, Jing Sun4
1Department of Medical Imaging, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital & Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Objectives:
To investigate whether amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) can be used to evaluate endometrial carcinoma (EC) in terms of clinical type, histological grade, subtype, and Ki-67 index.
Methods:
Eighty-eight patients with EC underwent pelvic DKI and APTWI. The non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (Dapp), apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), and magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) were calculated and compared based on the clinical type (type I, II), histological grade (high- and low-grade), and subtype (endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA) and non-EA). Correlation coefficients were calculated for each parameter with histological grades and the Ki-67 index.
Results:
The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and Kapp values were higher in the type II group and high-grade group than in the type I and low-grade groups, respectively, while the Dapp values were lower in the type I and low-grade groups, respectively (all p < 0.05). The Kapp value was higher in the EA group than in the non-EA group (p = 0.022). The Kapp value was the only independent predictor for the histological grade of EA and the clinical type of EC. The AUC (DKI) was higher than the AUC (APTWI) in the identification of type I and II EC and high- and low-grade EA (Z = 2.042, 2.013, p = 0.041, 0.044), while in the identification of EA and non-EA, only the difference in Kapp was statistically significant. Moreover, the Kapp and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) values and Dapp values correlated positively and negatively, respectively, with histological grade (r = 0.759, 0.555, 0.624, and 0.462, all p < 0.05) and Ki-67 index (r = -0.704, -0.507, all p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Both DKI- and APTWI-related parameters have potential as imaging markers in estimating the histological features of EC, while DKI shows better performance than APTWI in this study.
Key Points:
• DKI and APTWI can be used to preliminarily evaluate the histological characteristics of endometrial carcinoma (EC). • The Kapp was the only independent predictor for the histological grade of EA and the clinical type of EC. • The Kapp, MTRasym (3.5 ppm), and Dapp correlated positively and negatively, respectively, with histological grade and Ki-67 index.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Advancing Reproductive Immunology with a Protocol for the Quantitative Evaluation of Endometrial Immune Cells
Published on: October 13, 2023
05:16Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunohistochemical Staining of Four Endometrial Immune Cell Types in Recurrent Miscarriage
Published on: August 4, 2021