Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

865
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
865
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

712
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
712
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.2K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

10.3K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
10.3K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

16.7K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
16.7K
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

40.3K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
40.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lateral Extra-articular Procedure Augmentation Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Arthrofibrosis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same author

Sports Unite All of Us.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Editorial Commentary: Traveling to A New Dimension in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Stratification: Holistic 3-Dimensional Knee Phenotyping via Automated Artificial Intelligence Pipelines.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·2026
Same author

The Persistent Challenges of Diagnosing Orthopaedic Implant-Related Infections.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Predicting self-reported injury status among runners training for the New York City Marathon.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Disparities in Revision Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review of Racial, Sex-Based, and Geographic Domains.

Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.3K

Causal Language in Observational Orthopaedic Research.

Nathan H Varady1, Aliya G Feroe1, Mark Alan Fontana2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|April 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Causal language is frequently misused in observational orthopaedic research, with 60% of studies overstating findings. Researchers should use "association" instead of causal terms to improve accuracy in reporting observational data.

More Related Videos

A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee
05:04

A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee

Published on: July 5, 2021

2.3K
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
07:43

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy

Published on: July 2, 2021

3.3K
A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee
05:04

A Non-Invasive Method for Generating the Cyclic Loading-Induced Intra-Articular Cartilage Lesion Model of the Rat Knee

Published on: July 5, 2021

2.3K
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic research
  • Clinical data analysis
  • Scientific communication

Background:

  • Observational orthopaedic research is increasing due to large clinical registries and administrative data.
  • Single observational studies have limitations in determining causation.
  • Accurate reporting is crucial to prevent misinterpretation and guide clinical care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the prevalence of causal language misuse in observational orthopaedic research.
  • To highlight the implications of inaccurate reporting in scientific literature.
  • To provide guidance on more precise language for observational findings.

Main Methods:

  • A random sample of 400 observational orthopaedic studies was analyzed.
  • Prevalence of causal language was quantified.
  • Data-backed commentary was used to discuss findings.

Main Results:

  • Causal language was misused in 60% of the sampled observational orthopaedic studies.
  • The findings indicate a widespread issue with overstating conclusions from observational data.
  • This misuse can lead to inaccurate interpretations of research.

Conclusions:

  • Observational orthopaedic studies frequently misuse causal language, overstating definitive cause-and-effect relationships.
  • The term "association" and its derivatives can more accurately represent findings from observational research.
  • Adopting precise language enhances scientific integrity and clinical decision-making.