Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

188
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
188
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

163
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
163
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

176
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
176
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

135
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
135
Taping Over Different Ground Profiles01:12

Taping Over Different Ground Profiles

156
Taping over varying ground profiles requires careful adaptation to achieve accurate measurements. On smooth, level ground with minimal vegetation, the tape can rest directly on the ground. Here, the taping team, typically consisting of a head and a rear tapeman, coordinates their positions with clear communication. The rear tapeman holds the tape at the starting point and guides the head tapeman toward a range pole placed beyond the endpoint, using hand or voice signals to ensure alignment.On...
156

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attributing Blame to Robots: I. The Influence of Robot Autonomy.

Human factors·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.6K

Temporal Sensitivity and Latency During Teleoperation: Using Track Clearance to Understand Errors in Future

Federico Scholcover1,2, Douglas J Gillan1

  • 16798 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.

Human Factors
|April 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in time perception influence teleoperation task performance, especially with varying latency and route clearance. Results showed interactions but not always in predicted directions.

Keywords:
human performance modelingindividual differencesmotor behaviorperception-actionteleoperation

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.4K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.6K
Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.4K
An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles
09:27

An Emerging Target Paradigm to Evoke Fast Visuomotor Responses on Human Upper Limb Muscles

Published on: August 25, 2020

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Robotics
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Teleoperation tasks are hindered by communication latency, impacting operator performance.
  • Individual differences in time perception have previously predicted performance in latency-affected tasks.
  • This study extends this by examining how time perception relates to movement over/underestimation in varying route widths.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of individual time perception differences on task performance during teleoperation with induced latency.
  • To determine if time perception predicts movement over/underestimation in routes of varying widths under latency.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a time estimation task with short visual stimuli (≤2s).
  • Participants completed a route navigation task using a virtual cube under varying latency conditions.
  • Route navigation trials included different horizontal clearance widths (4-10m).

Main Results:

  • Latency interacted with time estimation and route clearance on trial-level performance (e.g., completion time).
  • Interactions were also observed at the action-level (e.g., time spent moving per move event).
  • Observed effects were not consistently in the predicted direction.

Conclusions:

  • Route clearance and timing significantly affect teleoperation performance at both trial and action levels.
  • The study highlights the complex interplay between latency, environmental factors, and individual perception.
  • Further research is needed to understand how these factors influence movement strategy selection.