Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Generation and Expansion of Primary, Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Tumor Lines
Published on: April 21, 2022
Three Decades of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Academic Center Experience
Abdullah Nasser1, Andrew Baird2, Mathieu D Saint-Pierre3
1Department of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a challenging disease to manage. In the past few decades, extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters were introduced to MPM care with variable levels of efficacy and evidence.
Patients And Methods:
This was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with MPM between January 1991 and March 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Data were examined by decade to assess trends in MPM demographics, management, and OS. A subgroup analysis was then conducted to examine the impact of EPP, pemetrexed, and indwelling pleural catheters on OS.
Results:
The study included 337 patients; 309 patients had died at last follow-up (91.7%). Median age at diagnosis and the proportion of female patients increased from 65.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57.1-73.7) and 11.6% female from 1991 to 1999 to 75 years (IQR, 68.1-80.6) and 20.5% female from 2010 to 2019. Median OS was largely unchanged in the three study periods: 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-12.7) in the 1991-1999 cohort, 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.6-13.2) in the 2000-2009 cohort, and 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.6) in the 2010-2019 cohort. Controlling for a number of demographic and prognostic factors, EPP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .02), pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87; P = .007), and indwelling pleural catheters (HR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.13-0.71; P = .006) were each associated with improvements in OS.
Conclusion:
Despite the small incremental improvements in survival shown by the three interventions we examined, prognosis remains guarded for MPM patients. Better modalities of management are needed.
Insights
Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), pemetrexed chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters show modest survival benefits for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Despite these advances, MPM prognosis remains poor, necessitating improved management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Thoracic Surgery
- Pulmonary Medicine
Background:
- Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a difficult-to-treat cancer.
- Key interventions like extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters have been introduced with varying success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate trends in MPM demographics, management, and overall survival (OS) over three decades.
- To assess the impact of EPP, pemetrexed chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters on OS in MPM patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 337 MPM patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2019.
- Analysis of patient data stratified by decade to identify demographic and management trends.
- Subgroup analysis to determine the effect of specific interventions (EPP, pemetrexed, indwelling pleural catheters) on OS.
Main Results:
- Median OS remained largely unchanged across the three decades, approximately 9-10 months.
- Despite stable median OS, EPP, pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters were each independently associated with improved OS.
- Increased median age and proportion of female patients diagnosed with MPM were observed over time.
Conclusions:
- While EPP, pemetrexed chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters offer some survival benefits, the overall prognosis for MPM patients remains guarded.
- There is a continued need for the development of more effective management strategies for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pleural Disorders: Types and Brief Description
Pleural Effusion II: Symptoms and Management
A pleural effusion is the abnormal collection of fluid between the parietal and visceral pleura layers of tissue that form the lining of the lungs and chest cavity. It can occur independently or due to surrounding parenchymal diseases, such as infection, malignancy, or inflammatory conditions.
Clinical Manifestations:

