Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
A Phase II Study of Durvalumab in Combination with Tremelimumab in Patients with Rare Cancers
William Jeffery Edenfield1, Ki Chung1, Mark O'Rourke1
1Prisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
Lessons Learned:
Disease control with signals of response were demonstrated, which should lead to future validating clinical trials using checkpoint inhibitors in this underserved rare malignancy population. Although the study of single types of rare cancers is practically challenging, clinical trial designs that aggregate such patients into cohorts treated similarly are feasible, even in the community setting.
Background:
Patients with rare cancers are an underserved population with limited access to clinical trials aside from phase I trials in the refractory setting. Treatment of these patients is often based on collections of anecdotes and small denominator review articles. Despite broad evidence of efficacy of combined immune checkpoint blockade across multiple tumor types, patients with rare tumors have not been afforded the opportunity for these therapies.
Methods:
A phase II, investigator-initiated, single institution trial using durvalumab (1,500 mg every [Q]4 weeks × 13) and tremelimumab (75 mg Q4 weeks × 7, then Q12 weeks × 2) is reported. The population included 50 patients with advanced rare solid tumors (incidence <6/100,000 per year). The phase II dose and safety profile were defined in prior phase I trials. All patients had exhausted standard therapy options and all had received at least one prior line of systemic therapy (n = 49) unless a standard treatment option did not exist (n = 1).
Results:
A complete response was demonstrated in one patient with anal cancer. Striking partial responses were seen in four patients. Prolonged disease stability was noted in 18 patients. Thirteen patients experienced disease progression. Patients were considered unevaluable if unable to initiate therapy (n = 6) or unable to complete two cycles of therapy (n = 8). In all cases, patients were unevaluable because of clinical deterioration. The toxicity profile paralleled prior published studies. Toxicities were manageable and without new signals. There were two events of grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis and one death from pneumonitis.
Conclusion:
This single-cohort basket trial demonstrated clinical activity from combined checkpoint blockade in 23 of the 36 evaluable patients. Patients with rare cancers, not eligible for immunotherapy via conventional clinical trial mechanisms, should be considered for this therapy through compassionate use, further clinical trials, and national registry programs.
Insights
This study shows that combined immune checkpoint blockade with durvalumab and tremelimumab demonstrated clinical activity in patients with rare solid tumors. These findings support further trials for this underserved population, offering new hope for rare cancer treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Rare Cancers
Background:
- Patients with rare cancers have limited access to clinical trials and often lack effective standard therapies.
- Evidence supports immune checkpoint blockade efficacy across various tumor types, yet rare tumors are often excluded.
- Treatment for rare cancers typically relies on anecdotal evidence and small studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced rare solid tumors.
- To explore the feasibility of a single-cohort basket trial design for rare cancer populations.
- To assess the potential of durvalumab and tremelimumab in an underserved patient group.
Main Methods:
- A phase II, investigator-initiated, single-institution trial was conducted.
- Fifty patients with advanced rare solid tumors received durvalumab and tremelimumab.
- All patients had exhausted standard treatment options or had no existing standard therapy.
Main Results:
- Clinical activity was observed in 23 out of 36 evaluable patients, including one complete response and four partial responses.
- Eighteen patients experienced prolonged disease stability.
- The toxicity profile was manageable and consistent with previous studies, with manageable toxicities, including two grade 4 immune-mediated hepatitis events and one death from pneumonitis.
Conclusions:
- Combined checkpoint blockade demonstrated clinical activity in a cohort of patients with rare solid tumors.
- This trial design is feasible for aggregating rare cancer patients for similar treatment.
- Patients with rare cancers should be considered for immunotherapy through compassionate use, further trials, and registry programs.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...

