Discriminative Ability for Adverse Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Comparison of Three Commonly Used

Junfei Guo1,2, Jun Di1, Xian Gao3

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Gerontology
|April 25, 2021
PubMed

Insights

The modified Elixhauser

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Geriatric Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Preoperative risk assessment is crucial for predicting adverse outcomes in hip fracture surgery.
  • Existing models like Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), modified Elixhauser's Comorbidity Measure (mECM), and modified frailty index (mFI-5) have limitations and no consensus on optimal use.
  • Accurate risk stratification aids in surgical decision-making and patient management strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify risk factors and patient characteristics for predicting mortality, perioperative complications, and extended length of stay (LOS) after hip fracture surgery.
  • To compare the predictive performance of CCI, mECM, and mFI-5 when combined with a base model.
  • To determine the optimal risk adjustment model for adverse outcomes in hip fracture patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 2,241 hip fracture patients (age ≥65) undergoing surgery (PFNA) from 2013-2018.
  • Development and comparison of multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Inclusion of a base model with patient characteristics (age, BMI, ASA grade, etc.) and comorbidity indices (CCI, mECM, mFI-5).

Main Results:

  • The base model combined with mECM demonstrated superior prediction for major complications (AUCs ranging from 0.637 to 0.679).
  • Base model + CCI showed better prediction for minor neurological and hematological complications (AUCs ~0.659).
  • Age was the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.35), while BMI, surgical delay, anesthesia type, and ASA grade predicted extended LOS.

Conclusions:

  • The modified Elixhauser's Comorbidity Measure (mECM), when combined with a base model, appears to be the most effective index for predicting major complications in hip fracture surgery.
  • The base model alone provides good discrimination for mortality and extended LOS, with limited improvement from adding comorbidity indices.
  • Further research may refine risk assessment for optimizing patient outcomes after hip fracture surgery.
Abstract