Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Geographical Differences in Cardiovascular Comorbidities and Outcomes of COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in the USA
Efstratios Koutroumpakis1, S Shahrukh Hashmi2, Christopher Powell1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Insights
Hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Texas had higher rates of diabetes and required more mechanical ventilation than those in New York. Despite differing comorbidities, in-hospital mortality was similar, but Texas patients experienced longer times to support and death.
Area of Science:
- Comparative outcomes of COVID-19 patients across different US regions.
- Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on COVID-19 severity and outcomes.
Background:
- Cardiovascular comorbidities are linked to adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
- Significant regional variations in cardiovascular comorbidity burden exist across the USA.
- Systematic study of regional differences in COVID-19 outcomes is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in underlying cardiovascular comorbidities.
- To compare clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients between Texas and New York.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter retrospective registry of COVID-19 patients (March 15 - July 12, 2020).
- Data manually retrieved from electronic medical records.
- Outcomes analyzed: mortality, pharmacologic circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis; logistic regression performed.
Main Results:
- Texas cohort (n=296) younger, higher BMI, more diabetes; New York cohort (n=218) higher rates of coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation.
- Texas patients had increased need for circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis.
- In-hospital mortality was similar; mechanical ventilation remained higher in Texas after adjustment. Median time to support and mortality was longer in Texas.
Conclusions:
- Geographical variations in practice patterns and disease burden influence COVID-19 outcomes.
- Unadjusted data can bias healthcare resource allocation and policy.
- Regional differences in comorbidities and care necessitate tailored approaches for COVID-19 management.
Introduction:
Cardiovascular comorbidities may predispose to adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, across the USA, the burden of cardiovascular comorbidities varies significantly. Whether clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 differ between regions has not yet been studied systematically. Here, we report differences in underlying cardiovascular comorbidities and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Texas and in New York state.
Methods:
We established a multicenter retrospective registry including patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between March 15 and July 12, 2020. Demographic and clinical data were manually retrieved from electronic medical records. We focused on the following outcomes: mortality, need for pharmacologic circulatory support, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for hemodialysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.
Results:
Patients in the Texas cohort (n = 296) were younger (57 vs. 63 years, p value <0.001), they had a higher BMI (30.3 kg/m2 vs. 28.5 kg/m2, p = 0.015), and they had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (41 vs. 30%; p = 0.014). In contrast, patients in the New York state cohort (n = 218) had higher rates of coronary artery disease (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.005) and atrial fibrillation (11 vs. 5%, p = 0.012). Pharmacologic circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis were more frequent in the Texas cohort (21 vs. 13%, p = 0.020; 30 vs. 12%, p < 0.001; and 11 vs. 5%, p = 0.009, respectively). In-hospital mortality was similar between the 2 cohorts (16 vs. 18%, p = 0.469). After adjusting for differences in underlying comorbidities, only the use of mechanical ventilation remained significantly higher in the participating Texas hospitals (odds ratios [95% CI]: 3.88 [1.23, 12.24]). Median time to pharmacologic circulatory support was 8 days (interquartile range: 2, 13.8) in the Texas cohort compared to 1 day (0, 3) in the New York state cohort, while median time to in-hospital mortality was 16 days (10, 25.5) and 7 days (4, 14), respectively (both p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in the late versus the early study phase in the New York state cohort (24 vs. 14%, p = 0.050), while it was similar between the 2 phases in the Texas cohort (16 vs. 15%, p = 0.741).
Conclusions:
Geographical differences, including practice pattern variations and the impact of disease burden on provision of health care, are important for the evaluation of COVID-19 outcomes. Unadjusted data may cause bias affecting future regulatory policies and proper allocation of resources.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology

