Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana Growth Behavior in Different Light Qualities
Published on: February 2, 2018
Grapevine morphological shade acclimation is mediated by light quality whereas hydraulic shade acclimation is
Carina V González1, Jorge A Prieto2, Carlos Mazza3
1IBAM (Instituto de Biología Agrícola de Mendoza), FCA UNCuyo - CONICET, Almirante Brown 500, Chacras de Coria, 5505, Luján de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina; FCEN (Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales), Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Padre Contreras 1300, 5500, Mendoza, Argentina.
Abstract:
Plants acclimate to shade by sensing light signals such as low photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), low blue light (BL) levels and low red-to-far red ratios (R:FR) trough plant photoreceptors cross talk. We previously demonstrated that grapevine is irresponsive to variations in R:FR and that BL-attenuation mediates morphological and architectural responses to shade increasing light interception and absorption efficiencies. However, we wondered if grapevine respond to low R:FR when BL is attenuated at the same time. Our objective was to evaluate if morphological, architectural and hydraulic acclimation to shade is mediated by low R:FR ratios and BL attenuation. To test this, we carried out experiments under natural radiation, manipulating light quality by selective sunlight exclusion and light supplementation. We grew grapevines under low PAR (LP) and four high PAR (HP) treatments: HP, HP plus FR supplementation (HP + FR), HP with BL attenuation (HP-B) and HP with BL attenuation plus FR supplementation (HP-B + FR). We found that plants grown under HP-B and HP-B + FR had similar morphological (stem and petiole length, leaf thickness and area), architectural (laminae' angles) and anatomical (stomatal density) traits than plants grown under LP. However, only LP plants presented lower stomata differentiation, lower δ13C and hence lower water use efficiency. Therefore, even under a BL and R:FR attenuated environment, morphological and architectural responses were modulated by BL but not by variation in R:FR. Meanwhile water relations were affected by PAR intensity but not by changes in light quality. Knowing grapevine responses to light quantity and quality are indispensable to adopt tools or design new cultural management practices that manipulate irradiance in the field intending to improve crop performance.
More Related Videos
06:41Imaging and Analysis for Quantifying Maize (Zea mays) Abiotic Stress Phenotypes
Published on: March 28, 2025
12:11Measurement of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance and Stomatal Conductance and Their Responses to Irradiance and Dehydration Using the Evaporative Flux Method EFM
Published on: December 31, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Light Acquisition
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Morphogenesis