Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bounds on net survival probabilities for dependent competing risks.

J P Klein1, M L Moeschberger

  • 1Department of Statistics, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

Biometrics
|June 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Internet-based self-management interventions : Quality criteria for their use in prevention and treatment of mental disorders].

Der Nervenarzt·2018
Same author

Neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Are we making mountains out of molehills?

Psychological medicine·2017
Same author

Reply to: Comments on 'Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green in colorectal carcinomatosis surgery: Proof of concept'.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2016
Same author

[Internet-based interventions in the treatment of mental disorders : Overview, quality criteria, perspectives].

Der Nervenarzt·2016
Same author

Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging using indocyanine green in colorectal carcinomatosis surgery: Proof of concept.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2016
Same author

[Guideline-adherent inpatient psychiatric psychotherapeutic treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder : Normative definition of personnel requirements].

Der Nervenarzt·2016
Same journal

Interim analysis in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials for survival outcomes.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Acknowledgment of Referees 2025.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

New bounds for marginal survival functions in competing-risks experiments improve upon existing methods. These bounds offer tighter estimations by incorporating a range of possible concordances for event times.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Competing-risks experiments involve multiple potential causes of event occurrence.
  • Estimating marginal survival functions is crucial for understanding event probabilities over time.
  • Existing methods, such as Peterson (1976), provide bounds but can be improved.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive new, tighter bounds for the marginal survival function in competing-risks settings.
  • To introduce a method that accounts for a range of concordances between competing risks.
  • To offer an alternative to existing bounding techniques in survival analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing data from competing-risks experiments.
  • Developing bounds for the marginal survival function.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporating a specified range of possible concordances for the times to occurrences of competing risks.

    • Main Results:

    • New bounds for the marginal survival function were successfully obtained.
    • The derived bounds are demonstrated to be tighter than those previously established by Peterson (1976).
    • The method's effectiveness is contingent on the investigator specifying a plausible range for risk concordances.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method provides improved bounds for marginal survival functions in competing-risks data.
    • This approach offers a more refined estimation tool for survival analysis.
    • Investigator input on risk concordance is essential for applying these tighter bounds.