Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
An open-label randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine in severe
Álvaro Réa-Neto1, Rafaella Stradiotto Bernardelli2, Bruna Martins Dzivielevski Câmara2
1Federal University of Paraná (UFPR); CEPETI, Center for Study and Research in Intensive Care Medicine, Rua Monte Castelo, 366, Curitiba, CEP, 82590-300, Brazil. reaneto@uol.com.br.
Insights
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine did not improve outcomes for severe COVID-19 patients. Adding these drugs to standard care worsened clinical status and increased risks of renal dysfunction and mechanical ventilation.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Efficacy of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 remains uncertain, particularly in severe cases.
- Standard care alone is the benchmark for treating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
- Investigating repurposed drugs for novel viral infections is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and safety of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine combined with standard care versus standard care alone in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients.
- To evaluate the impact on clinical status, mortality, mechanical ventilation, and renal dysfunction.
- To identify potential harmful effects associated with these drug combinations.
Main Methods:
- Randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III trial involving 105 patients with severe COVID-19.
- Intervention group received chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for five days alongside standard care.
- Primary outcome: clinical status on day 14; secondary outcomes: mortality, mechanical ventilation, renal dysfunction, and clinical status at multiple time points.
Main Results:
- The trial was halted early due to harmful effects in the intervention group.
- Patients receiving chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine showed worse clinical outcomes on days 14 and 28.
- Increased incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation and severe renal dysfunction (KDIGO stage 3) was observed in the intervention group.
Conclusions:
- Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine added to standard treatment significantly worsened clinical status in severe COVID-19.
- The combination therapy increased the risk of renal dysfunction and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation.
- These findings suggest that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are not beneficial and may be harmful for severe COVID-19 patients.
Abstract:
Despite several studies designed to evaluate the efficacy of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is still doubt about the effects of these drugs, especially in patients with severe forms of the disease. This randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III trial assessed the efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for five days in combination with standard care compared to standard care alone in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. Chloroquine 450 mg BID on day 1 and 450 mg once daily from days 2 to 5 or hydroxychloroquine 400 mg BID on day 1 and 400 mg once daily from days 2 to 5 were administered in the intervention group. Patients were enrolled from April 16 to August 06, 2020, in 6 hospitals in southern Brazil. The primary outcome was the clinical status measured on day 14 after randomization with a 9-point ordinal scale. The main secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality; invasive mechanical ventilation use; the incidence of acute renal dysfunction in 28 days; and the clinical status of patients on days 5, 7, 10 and 28. All patients with a positive RT-PCR result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were analyzed (modified intention to treat (mITT) population). Arrythmias and cardiovascular complications were assessed as safety outcomes. A total of 105 patients were enrolled and followed for 28 days. The trial was stopped before reaching the planned sample size due to harmful effects. Patients in the intervention group had a worse clinical outcome on the 14th day (odds ratio (OR) 2.45 [1.17 to 4.93], p = 0.016) and on the 28th day (OR 2.47 [1.15 to 5.30], p = 0.020). Moreover, the intervention group had higher incidences of invasive mechanical ventilation use (risk ratio (RR) 2.15 [1.05 to 4.40], p = 0.030) and severe renal dysfunction (KDIGO stage 3) (RR 2.24 [1.01 to 4.99], p = 0.042) until the 28th day of follow-up. No significant arrythmia was noted. In patients with severe COVID-19, the use of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine added to standard treatment resulted in a significant worsening of clinical status, an increased risk of renal dysfunction and an increased need for invasive mechanical ventilation.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04420247. Registered 09 June 2020-Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT04420247 .
More Related Videos
06:29Comparing Objective Conjunctival Hyperemia Grading and the Ocular Surface Disease Index Score in Dry Eye Syndrome During COVID-19
Published on: May 25, 2022
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...
Blinding