Ipsilateral and contralateral responses following unimanual fatigue with and without illusionary mirror visual...

Illusionary mirror visual feedback alters interhemispheric communication and influences cross-limb interactions. Combining forceful unimanual contractions with the mirror illusion is a convenient way to provoke robust alterations within ipsilateral motor networks. It is unknown, however, if the mirror illusion affects cross-limb fatigability. We examine this concept by comparing the ipsilateral and contralateral handgrip force and electromyographic (EMG) responses following unimanual fatigue with and without illusionary mirror visual feedback. Participants underwent three experimental sessions (mirror, no-mirror, and control), performing a unimanual fatigue protocol with and without illusionary mirror visual feedback. Maximal handgrip force and EMG activity were measured before and after each session for both hands during maximal unimanual and bimanual contractions. The associated EMG activity from the inactive forearm during unimanual contraction was also examined. The novel findings demonstrate greater relative fatigability during bimanual versus unimanual contraction following unimanual fatigue (-31.8% vs. -23.4%, P < 0.01) and the mirror illusion attenuates this difference (-30.3% vs. -26.3%, P = 0.169). The results show no evidence for a cross-over effect of fatigue with (+0.62%, -2.72%) or without (+0.26%, -2.49%) the mirror illusion during unimanual or bimanual contraction. The mirror illusion resulted in significantly lower levels of associated EMG activity in the contralateral forearm. There were no sex differences for any of the measures of fatigability. These results demonstrate that the mirror illusion influences contraction-dependent fatigue during maximal handgrip contractions. Alterations in facilitatory and inhibitory transcallosal drive likely explain these findings.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Illusionary mirror visual feedback is a promising clinical tool for motor rehabilitation, yet many features of its influence on motor output are unknown. We show that maximal bimanual force output is compromised to a greater extent than unimanual force output following unimanual fatigue, yet illusionary mirror visual feedback attenuates this difference. The mirror illusion also reduces the unintended EMG activity of the inactive, contralateral forearm during unimanual contraction.