Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Implantation of Electroencephalogram and Electrocardiogram Telemetry Devices in Neonatal Rabbit Kits
Published on: February 28, 2025
Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: A Personalized Prediction Tool
Ashwani Jha1, Cheongeun Oh2, Dale Hesdorffer2
1From the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre (A.J., B.D., J.W.S.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK; Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health (C.O.), New York University Langone Health; Department of Epidemiology (D.H.), Columbia University Medical Center; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (S.D., O.D.), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York; Epilepsy Unit (M.J.B.), University of Glasgow, Scotland; Department of Clinical Neuroscience (T.T.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy (J.W.S.), Chalfont St Peter, UK; Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN) (J.W.S.), Heemstede, the Netherlands; and MINCEP Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (T.S.W.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ashwani.jha@ucl.ac.uk.
Objective:
To develop and validate a tool for individualized prediction of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) risk, we reanalyzed data from 1 cohort and 3 case-control studies undertaken from 1980 through 2005.
Methods:
We entered 1,273 epilepsy cases (287 SUDEP, 986 controls) and 22 clinical predictor variables into a Bayesian logistic regression model.
Results:
Cross-validated individualized model predictions were superior to baseline models developed from only average population risk or from generalized tonic-clonic seizure frequency (pairwise difference in leave-one-subject-out expected log posterior density = 35.9, SEM ± 12.5, and 22.9, SEM ± 11.0, respectively). The mean cross-validated (95% bootstrap confidence interval) area under the receiver operating curve was 0.71 (0.68-0.74) for our model vs 0.38 (0.33-0.42) and 0.63 (0.59-0.67) for the baseline average and generalized tonic-clonic seizure frequency models, respectively. Model performance was weaker when applied to nonrepresented populations. Prognostic factors included generalized tonic-clonic and focal-onset seizure frequency, alcohol excess, younger age at epilepsy onset, and family history of epilepsy. Antiseizure medication adherence was associated with lower risk.
Conclusions:
Even when generalized to unseen data, model predictions are more accurate than population-based estimates of SUDEP. Our tool can enable risk-based stratification for biomarker discovery and interventional trials. With further validation in unrepresented populations, it may be suitable for routine individualized clinical decision-making. Clinicians should consider assessment of multiple risk factors, and not focus only on the frequency of convulsions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Epilepsy and Seizures: Overview
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Seizures: Classification
Seizures are typically classified into two main categories: focal and generalized seizures.
Focal Seizures
Focal seizures originate from specific regions of the brain. These seizures are further sub-classified into two types:

